Headrest Holder Pressing Structure for Stay Rattle Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing headrest holders struggle to effectively suppress rattling between the stay and the headrest due to insufficient pressing force and lack of components to restrict outward deformation of the pressing portion, especially when attached directly to the upper frame without a bracket.

Innovation Solution

A headrest holder with inwardly protruding pressing portions aligned in the up-down direction, fixed at both ends, and optionally paired with inclined portions and projection portions to ensure pressing force and inhibit oscillation, along with a locking mechanism for vertical fixation, all while being designed to minimize mold extraction complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the headrest holder is directly attached to the upper frame without a bracket, then the device complexity is reduced, but the pressing force cannot be ensured and rattling occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidpressing force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing portion is segmented into multiple sections (first pressing portion and second pressing portion) that are fixed at both ends to the tube body. This segmentation allows each section to independently apply pressing force to the stay, ensuring reliable pressing force without requiring a complex bracket structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing portions are arranged in the radial direction of the tube body, protruding inward to contact the stay. This radial arrangement provides multiple contact points around the circumference, distributing the pressing force effectively and preventing rattling without adding structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If the pressing portion is made from easily deformable resin, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the pressing force may be insufficient without a bracket to restrict deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selectionVSAvoidpressing force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing portions are pre-formed with a specific shape that includes inclined portions and a contact portion. This preliminary shaping allows the pressing portions to automatically generate the required pressing force when the headrest holder is assembled, eliminating the need for a bracket to restrict deformation during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing portions are made from resin material that combines ease of manufacture with sufficient mechanical properties. The resin is formulated to provide both deformability for absorbing impact and sufficient strength to maintain pressing force, replacing the need for metal brackets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If the pressing portion is designed assuming contact with the bracket, then the manufacturing precision is maintained, but rattling cannot be suppressed when no bracket is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign consistencyVSAvoidrattling suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of designing the pressing portion to contact the bracket (external reference), the design is inverted to make the pressing portion self-contained, with both ends fixed to the tube body. This inversion makes the pressing portion independent of the bracket, maintaining manufacturing precision while ensuring rattling suppression in bracketless configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing portion is designed to be self-sufficient, with both ends fixed to the tube body, allowing it to generate and maintain pressing force independently without relying on the bracket for support or positioning. This self-service design ensures consistent performance regardless of bracket presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If the stay can oscillate with one contact point, then the ease of operation is improved, but rattling occurs due to fulcrum oscillation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheadrest adjustmentVSAvoidoscillation rattling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing portion is divided into multiple sections (first and second pressing portions) that contact the stay at different locations. This segmentation creates multiple contact points that prevent the stay from oscillating around a single fulcrum, eliminating rattling while maintaining adjustment functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing portions are arranged not only in the radial direction but also positioned at different heights along the tube body. This multi-dimensional arrangement creates distributed contact points that constrain the stay effectively, preventing oscillation rattling while allowing smooth adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively suppresses rattling of the stay relative to the headrest holder by ensuring consistent pressing force and frictional contact, even with deformable materials, while maintaining structural integrity and ease of assembly.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the pressing portions is pressed against the stay, and outward deformation of the pressing portion is restricted by the inner peripheral surface of the bracket, thereby ensuring a pressing force by the pressing portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

By the contact portion coming into surface contact with the stay, a pressing force from each pressing portion to the stay and a frictional force therebetween can be ensured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12545163B2Headrest holder and fixing structure therefor
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 TACHI S CO LTD
  • US12545163B2 patent drawing
  • US12545163B2 patent drawing
  • US12545163B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plurality of pressing portions 38 protrude inward in a radial direction from an inner peripheral surface of a tubular main body portion 35 (part of a tube body) and are each fixed at both ends thereof in an up-down direction to the main body portion 35. Since the plurality of pressing portions 38 are aligned in the up-down direction, a stay 22 or 23 can be inhibited from oscillating with a contact portion between one pressing portion 38 and the stay 22 or 23 as a fulcrum. As a result, rattling of the stay 22 or 23 relative to a headrest holder 30 or 31 can be suppressed.