Headrest Stay End Forming with Thin-Walled R Chamfers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing headrest stays, such as spinning and swaging processes, often result in cracks due to high tightening forces and inadequate R chamfered shapes that do not meet European automobile standards for passenger safety.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a boring process to create thin-walled portions on metal round pipes, followed by press molding to form R chamfered shapes with a radius of 5 mm or more, which reduces the likelihood of cracks and enhances the structural integrity of the headrest stay.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If spinning process or swaging process is used to form R chamfered shape on headrest stay terminal portion, then the terminal portion can be formed with curved shape, but cracks may occur due to high tightening force and inadequate R radius

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveR chamfered shape of terminal portionVSAvoidcrack resistance of headrest stay
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the boring process to create thin-walled portions at the terminal end before performing the press molding process to form the R chamfered shape. This preparatory removal of material reduces the section modulus at the terminal end, allowing the subsequent pressing to form a larger R radius (5mm or more) without requiring excessive tightening force that would cause cracks. The preliminary thinning action enables the final shaping to achieve both the required curved geometry and crack resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Shape

If high tightening force is applied during spinning or swaging process, then the metal round pipe can be deformed into curved shape, but cracks may occur in the headrest stay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurved chamfered shapeVSAvoidstructural integrity of headrest stay
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating thin-walled portions at specific locations (terminal ends) of the metal round pipe through the boring process, rather than uniformly thinning the entire pipe. This localized material removal concentrates the plastic deformation during press molding to specific regions where the R chamfered shape is formed, allowing adequate R radius with controlled tightening force. The local thinning enables targeted shaping without compromising the overall structural integrity of the headrest stay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If R radius is made small to facilitate shaping, then the manufacturing process becomes easier, but cracks may occur and safety standards may not be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaping processabilityVSAvoidR radius conformity to safety standards
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the wall thickness parameter at the terminal end through the boring process, creating thin-walled portions with reduced thickness before press molding. This parameter change enables the subsequent forming process to achieve a larger R radius (5mm or more) required by safety standards. The preliminary thinning reduces the material volume that needs to be deformed, making it easier to form the required curved shape with adequate R radius without excessive tightening force that would cause cracks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively prevents cracks and maintains the rigidity of the thin-walled portions, ensuring a smooth and secure R chamfered shape that meets safety standards without significant external shape changes or buckling distortions.

Implementation Method 1

performing a boring process on the metal round pipe by a cutting length of 5 mm or more from each of both distal ends of the metal round pipe to form a thin-walled portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial removal by cutting: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

pressing the distal ends of the metal round pipe against a bottom surface of the cylindrical hole to form each of the distal ends into an curved chamfered shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

bending the metal round pipe to have a shape of the headrest stay

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical bending: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS10160069B2Method for manufacturing headrest stay
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 TOYOTA BOSHOKU KK
  • US10160069B2 patent drawing
  • US10160069B2 patent drawing
  • US10160069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A headrest stay is manufactured with a metal round pipe having a predetermined length and a predetermined thickness by performing a boring process on the metal round pipe by a cutting length of 5 mm or more from each of both distal ends of the metal round pipe to form a thin-walled portion that is thinner than the predetermined thickness; forming each of the distal ends of the metal round pipe into an curved chamfered shape having a radius of 5 mm or more by inserting each of the distal ends of the metal round pipe into a cylindrical hole; and bending the metal round pipe to have a shape of the headrest stay.