Centralized Health Module for Extensible Error Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computing systems face inefficiencies in error handling due to the need for separate error resolution mechanisms for each component, which leads to resource duplication and difficulty in modifying or extending error handlers, especially when new error types are identified.

Innovation Solution

A health module in the computing system that monitors components for runtime errors and provides error resolution templates with metadata and error handlers, allowing components to associate error types with templates and define additional handlers, thereby extending error resolution capabilities without requiring separate error resolution systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate error resolution mechanisms are implemented for each component, then each component can handle its specific errors, but resource duplication occurs and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror handling capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal error resolution mechanism where a single error resolution service can handle errors from multiple different components. Error handlers are designed to be component-agnostic, allowing the same error resolution infrastructure to serve the entire system rather than requiring separate mechanisms for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges previously distributed error resolution capabilities into a centralized error resolution service. Multiple error handlers and resolution mechanisms are combined into a unified system that processes errors from any component through a common interface and resolution workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If separate error resolution mechanisms are implemented for each component, then each component has dedicated error handling, but resource duplication occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror handling capabilityVSAvoidresource duplication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The error resolution service and handlers are designed to be universally applicable across all components in the system. A single instance of error resolution infrastructure can handle errors from any number of components, eliminating the need for duplicate error handling resources for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple component-specific error resolution resources into a shared, centralized error resolution service. This merging eliminates redundant error handlers, logging mechanisms, and resolution workflows that would otherwise exist separately for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If component code is modified to add new error handlers, then new error types can be handled, but modification becomes difficult or impossible without extensibility mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror type coverageVSAvoidease of modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The error resolution system is designed to be dynamic and extensible. New error handlers can be registered and added to the system at runtime without requiring modifications to existing component code. The system adapts to new error types through plugin-style architecture where handlers can be dynamically incorporated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The error handling functionality is segmented into separate, independent error handlers that can be added or removed without affecting the core system. Each error handler is a discrete unit that can be independently developed, tested, and deployed, allowing easy extension of error type coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If existing error handlers are modified to handle new error types, then error coverage improves, but system stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror type coverageVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic addition of new error handlers without requiring modifications to existing stable code. New error types can be handled by adding new handlers that register with the error resolution service, preserving the stability of existing handlers while extending coverage to new error types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8078914B2Open error-handling system
Publication Date: 2011.12.13 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8078914B2 patent drawing
  • US8078914B2 patent drawing
  • US8078914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The embodiments disclosed herein extend to methods, systems, and computer program products for error resolution in a computing system that includes a health module. The health module monitors components of the system for runtime errors and provides error resolution templates. The error resolution templates include metadata that specifies actions that may resolve the error and error handlers corresponding to the actions that may correct the error. The system may be extended by the addition and/or modification of the error resolution templates. The error resolution templates may also be used to facilitate the correction of runtime errors in the system.