Healthcare Claims-Per-Healthy-Day Navigation Engine for Provider Ranking

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing healthcare systems lack a quantitative measure to evaluate healthcare outcomes in terms of dollars and cents, making it difficult to rank healthcare providers and items based on their efficiency and calculate returns on investment.

Innovation Solution

A navigation engine that quantifies healthcare outcomes in terms of risk-adjusted claims per healthy day, combining cost and quality into a single dollar and cent value, using a hierarchical data representation and machine learning to analyze medical and pharmacy claims.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If healthcare outcomes are measured in qualitative terms (compliance with checklists, patient satisfaction scores), then measurement simplicity is maintained, but the ability to rank providers and calculate ROI is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms healthcare outcome measurement from qualitative parameters (compliance yes/no, satisfaction scores) to a quantitative parameter (claims per healthy day ratio expressed in dollars and cents). This parameter change enables precise ranking and ROI calculation while maintaining system feasibility through the use of existing claims data infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If healthcare outcomes are quantified in dollars and cents using claims per healthy day, then provider ranking and ROI calculation become possible, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational framework that processes complex claims data through a structured methodology: determining healthy days using clinical criteria, calculating claims per healthy day ratios, and adjusting for risk factors. This intermediary process transforms raw complex data into standardized quantitative outcomes that enable provider ranking and ROI analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If traditional qualitative measurement methods are used, then data collection simplicity is maintained, but the ability to make informed cost-effective decisions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal measurement framework (claims per healthy day) that serves multiple functions simultaneously: it quantifies provider performance, enables ROI calculation, supports informed decision-making, and utilizes existing claims data infrastructure. This multi-functional approach maintains operational simplicity while dramatically improving information quality for decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250246294A1Healthcare clinical efficiency claims per healthy day navigation engine
Publication Date: 2025.07.31
  • US20250246294A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246294A1 patent drawing
  • US20250246294A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A navigation engine for medical and/or pharmacy claims (in combination with employer human resource records or on a stand-alone basis) that quantifies healthcare outcomes and ranks healthcare providers and other healthcare items by root diagnosis based on their overall average claims per healthy day (i.e., clinical efficiency). Claims per healthy day is the adjusted claims cost per day to keep a patient healthy (or in the case of an employer, keep an employee at work), so the lower, the better. The navigation engine uses drop-down menus and/or similar techniques that require the user to select a root diagnosis on which to search, as well as other variables (e.g., provider category, geographic proximity, in-network versus in or out of network, etc.), turning an open-ended question, e.g., “Which doctor should I go to for back pain?” to a closed-ended one “Which surgeons in my network within 25 miles have the best outcomes for back surgery?”