Healthcare Application Configuration Validation System
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Healthcare management systems face challenges in ensuring that applications, such as those used for radiological image viewing, are validated to meet specific requirements, leading to errors, delays, and increased costs due to the lack of proactive configuration validation, especially during software updates.
Innovation Solution
A system and method for validating the configuration of applications by comparing configuration file data with actual application data to determine if requirements are met, generating messages for updates or removal of unnecessary components, and allowing for proactive validation upon request or scheduled updates.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If applications are updated with new technology without proactive validation, then system functionality is improved, but errors and delays occur when users utilize the applications
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs configuration validation before users utilize updated applications. A validation manager proactively checks whether applications meet determined requirements and generates reports indicating whether the correct version is installed, preventing errors and delays before they occur.
2Reliability
If configuration validation is performed retroactively after users encounter problems, then issue detection is achieved, but additional manpower and time are required for resolution
Solution Approach 1:
The system shifts from retroactive to proactive validation by automatically checking application configurations before users encounter problems. The validation manager generates reports in advance, allowing issues to be identified and resolved before they impact users, thereby reducing the time and manpower needed for issue resolution.
3Stability of the object's composition
If the whole healthcare system is required to update to the newest version of an application, then consistency is improved, but complexity of maintenance increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system allows different locations and user interfaces to have different application versions based on their specific capabilities and requirements. The validation manager checks whether the installed version meets local requirements rather than enforcing a single universal version, reducing maintenance complexity while ensuring local consistency.
4Reliability
If proactive configuration validation is implemented, then errors are reduced, but additional resources are required for validation processes
Solution Approach 1:
The validation manager automatically performs configuration validation without requiring significant human intervention. The system self-validates application configurations by comparing them against determined requirements and generates reports autonomously, reducing the need for additional human resources while maintaining high reliability.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods, systems, and computer-storage media are provided for validating the configuration of one or more applications to be used by one or more users in a healthcare management system. Requests are received to perform a configuration validation for at least one application at a first location. Configuration file data comprising one or more requirements and configuration data for the at least one application is obtained. The configuration validation is performed by conducting a comparative analysis on the configuration file data and the configuration data. If the data is identical, then the requirements are met, and the correct version of the application is installed. If the data is not identical, then the system identifies the correct version that needs to be installed. A message is generated for the first user comprising the configuration validation outcome.