Heap Spray Detection via Blacklisted NOP Pattern Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heap spray detection methods using whitelists for NOP instructions lead to high false positives due to incomplete lists, requiring constant updates and resulting in improper flagging of non-malicious network traffic as malicious.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes memory allocation patterns, employing sampling techniques to identify NOP sleds in specific memory regions, and uses a blacklisted pattern approach to detect heap spray attacks, with a dynamic analysis engine monitoring and scoring potential threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a whitelist of NOP instructions is used for heap spray detection, then detection capability is improved, but false positive rate increases due to incomplete lists

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional whitelist approach by implementing a blacklist system. Instead of maintaining a list of permitted NOP instructions that must be matched, the system maintains a list of malicious patterns to detect. This inversion fundamentally changes the detection logic: rather than flagging everything except whitelisted items, the system now flags only items matching blacklisted patterns, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of the detection list from 'whitelist' to 'blacklist'. This parameter change transforms the detection mechanism from one that requires positive identification of permitted items to one that identifies prohibited items. The blacklist contains specific malicious NOP patterns (such as those followed by shellcode), and only matching these patterns triggers an alert, thus reducing false positives caused by incomplete whitelist coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a whitelist is constantly updated to include all possible non-malicious NOP instructions, then false positives are reduced, but system complexity and maintenance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoidsystem maintenance burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the whitelist to a blacklist, the system eliminates the need for constant updates to cover all possible non-malicious cases. The blacklist only needs to include known malicious patterns, which are far fewer in number. This inversion transforms an expanding maintenance burden into a manageable, stable system where updates are only needed when new malicious patterns are discovered, not when legitimate variations appear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential malicious patterns needed for detection into a compact blacklist, rather than attempting to enumerate all possible legitimate NOP instructions. This extraction approach creates a minimal, focused detection list that is easy to maintain. The system takes out only what is necessary (malicious patterns) and leaves the rest (legitimate variations) unrestricted, thereby reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If sampling techniques are used to analyze specific memory regions, then detection efficiency is improved, but detection coverage may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoiddetection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by focusing detection efforts on specific memory regions where heap spray attacks are most likely to occur. Rather than uniformly scanning all memory, the system identifies and prioritizes sampling in regions such as the heap where NOP sleds and shellcode are typically injected. This localized approach maintains high detection efficiency while preserving adequate coverage by concentrating resources on high-risk areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by sampling specific memory regions rather than analyzing the entire memory space. This partial approach is sufficient because heap spray attacks have predictable characteristics and locations. By applying excessive action to critical regions (intensive sampling in high-risk areas) and minimal action to low-risk areas, the system achieves efficient detection without sacrificing overall coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9438623B1Computer exploit detection using heap spray pattern matching
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US9438623B1 patent drawing
  • US9438623B1 patent drawing
  • US9438623B1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a threat detection system is integrated with at least a dynamic analysis engine. The dynamic analysis engine is configured to automatically to detect potential shellcode at a first storage location within a region of memory allocated for an application, conduct a first search at one or more storage locations prior to the first storage location within the region of allocated memory for at least one or more patterns, conduct a second search at one or more storage locations subsequent to the first storage location within the region of allocated memory for at least one or more patterns, detect a first pattern at one or more storage locations prior to the first storage location within the region of allocated memory, and detect a second pattern at one or more storage locations subsequent to the first storage location with the region of allocated memory, wherein at least one of the first pattern or the second pattern is absent from a predefined list of patterns.