Hearing Aid Signal Processing Delay Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hearing aids face challenges in balancing the positive effects of signal processing delay, which improves signal-to-noise ratio but can cause negative effects such as desynchronization of auditory and visual information, and interactions with proprioceptive input, leading to suboptimal user experience in noisy environments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a classifier that selects processing algorithms based on environment descriptors, including speech-to-noise ratio, direct-to-reverberant ratio, and GPS information, to dynamically adjust processing delay and customize signal processing according to user preferences, thereby optimizing the balance of delay effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If signal processing delay is increased to improve signal-to-noise ratio, then noise reduction capability is improved, but desynchronization of auditory and visual information occurs and user experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise interferenceVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the processing delay adjustable rather than fixed. The system dynamically changes the delay parameter based on environmental conditions (noisy vs. quiet environments) and user preferences, allowing optimization of noise reduction while minimizing negative effects on user experience in different contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing delay parameter based on environmental analysis. The controller analyzes environment descriptors and adjusts the delay parameter accordingly, allowing the system to optimize between noise reduction and synchronization effects by varying this key parameter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If processing algorithm is changed to optimize for noisy environments, then signal quality is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects and switches between different processing algorithms based on environmental conditions. In noisy environments, more intensive algorithms are applied to improve signal quality, while in quiet environments, lighter algorithms reduce processing time and power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes processing parameters including algorithm selection, delay values, and gain settings based on environmental analysis. This allows optimization of signal quality when needed while reducing computational load when environmental conditions permit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3065422B8Techniques for increasing processing capability in hear aids
Publication Date: 2019.06.12 STARKEY LABORATORIES INC

AI summary

The signal processing functions of a hearing aid as described above necessarily cause some delay between the time the audio signal is received by the microphone or wireless receiver and the time that the audio is actually produced by the output transducer. In some situations, signal processing incorporating longer delays may be better able to improve signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) or other functional parameters for a hearing aid wearer, but a balance should be struck between these positive effects of delay and other negative effects. The techniques described herein address the problem of balancing the positive and negative effects of delay.