Hearing Aid Adaptive Filter Artefact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hearing aid systems face challenges in minimizing the occurrence of artefacts due to adaptive filtering, particularly when reacting to sudden changes in input signals.

Innovation Solution

The method employs a Maximum-A-Posteriori (MAP) based approach for adaptive filter coefficient estimation, using Gaussian distributions to derive closed-form expressions for optimizing filter settings, which reduces artefacts by favoring desirable filter states and limiting the space of valid filters based on prior and transition covariance matrices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional adaptive filtering is used in hearing aid systems, then the system can process sound signals, but artefacts occur particularly when reacting to sudden changes in input signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing qualityVSAvoidartefacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining a space of valid filter coefficients through prior covariance matrices before adaptive filtering occurs. This constrains the adaptive filter to operate within predetermined bounds, preventing it from selecting coefficient values that would generate artefacts during sudden signal changes. The prior covariance matrix establishes acceptable filter states in advance, so when rapid changes occur, the filter remains within reliable operating parameters rather than drifting into artefact-prone regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the covariance matrices based on signal statistics. When sudden changes in input signals are detected, the system modifies the prior and transition covariance matrices to reflect current signal characteristics. This adaptive parameter adjustment allows the filter to respond to changing conditions while maintaining coefficient values within ranges that minimize artefact generation, thus improving signal processing quality during transient events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the adaptive filter reacts quickly to rapid changes in sound environments, then responsiveness improves, but artefact occurrence increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to sound changesVSAvoidartefacts
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the covariance matrices adaptive rather than static. The prior covariance matrix is updated based on current signal statistics, allowing the filter to dynamically adjust its constraints. During rapid sound changes, the system increases the adaptability parameters, enabling faster response. However, this dynamic adjustment occurs within the framework of the space of valid coefficients, ensuring that even during rapid adaptation, the filter coefficients remain within bounds that prevent artefact generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring signal statistics and using this information to update the covariance matrices. The system measures the actual signal characteristics and feeds this information back to adjust the prior and transition covariance matrices accordingly. This closed-loop approach allows the filter to respond quickly to sound environment changes while using the feedback information to maintain coefficient values within artefact-free regions, thus resolving the contradiction between speed and artefact prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the space of valid filter coefficients is constrained, then artefacts are reduced, but filter adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveartefactsVSAvoidfilter adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through dynamics by making the constraints themselves adaptive. The prior covariance matrix, which defines the space of valid filter coefficients, is not fixed but is updated based on signal statistics. During periods of rapid sound changes, the covariance matrix expands to allow greater coefficient variation, maintaining adaptability. During stable periods, the constraints are tighter, reducing artefacts. This dynamic constraint adjustment allows the system to maintain both artefact reduction and filter adaptability across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the covariance matrix parameters in response to signal characteristics. When the system detects rapid changes in sound environments, it adjusts the covariance parameters to allow a broader space of valid coefficients, thereby maintaining adaptability. When signals are stable, the parameters are adjusted to constrain the coefficient space more tightly, reducing artefacts. This parameter adaptation ensures that the filter maintains optimal performance across varying conditions without sacrificing either adaptability or artefact prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3311592B1Method of operating a hearing aid system and a hearing aid system
Publication Date: 2022.03.16 WIDEX AS
  • EP3311592B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3311592B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3311592B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A method of operating a hearing aid system (100, 200, 400, 500) using a maximized hyper parameter. The invention also provides a hearing aid system (100, 200, 400, 00) adapted for carrying out such a method and a computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions, which when executed carries out the method. Additionally the invention provides a method of fitting such a hearing aid system (100, 200, 400, 500).