Hearing Aid Fitting Using User Experience Values

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hearing device fitting sessions often result in unsatisfactory initial fits due to the lack of user experience consideration, leading to discomfort and potential abandonment of hearing devices, as hearing care professionals rely on guesswork rather than objective user experience values.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine user experience values based on historical data, characteristics, and preferences to adjust sound processing parameters in hearing devices, ensuring optimized sound signal processing for each user, regardless of their experience level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If hearing care professionals rely on guesswork for initial fitting, then the fitting process is simple and quick, but the fitting accuracy and user comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting accuracyVSAvoidfitting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting user profile information, fitting history, and device data before the fitting session. This advance preparation enables the algorithm to generate accurate initial sound processing parameters without requiring complex real-time adjustments during the fitting session, thereby improving fitting accuracy while maintaining process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary algorithm that acts as a mediator between the user's historical data and the sound processing parameters. This algorithm automatically processes fitting history, user preferences, and device characteristics to generate optimized initial settings, eliminating the need for professionals to rely on guesswork while avoiding manual complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If user experience values are not considered in initial fitting, then the fitting session is shorter and simpler, but user comfort and satisfaction worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidfitting session time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the algorithm to automatically determine user experience values and adjust sound processing parameters based on fitting history and user profiles. This automated self-adjustment improves user comfort through personalized settings while keeping the fitting session brief, as the system performs the complex analysis without requiring extended professional intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by utilizing fitting history data to inform initial parameter selection. The system feeds historical fitting outcomes, user preferences, and comfort levels back into the algorithm, which then optimizes initial settings accordingly. This feedback loop enhances user comfort while maintaining efficient fitting sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If hearing care professionals adjust parameters manually during fitting sessions, then flexibility and adaptability are improved, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical adjustment process with an automated computational system. Instead of professionals manually tweaking parameters based on experience, the system uses algorithms to automatically calculate and apply optimized sound processing parameters. This substitution dramatically improves fitting efficiency while the underlying complexity is managed by the automated system rather than requiring complex manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system efficiently manages complexity by systematically changing parameters based on user profiles and fitting history. The algorithm automatically adjusts multiple sound processing parameters simultaneously according to predetermined relationships and user-specific factors, improving productivity while keeping the parameter adjustment process organized and manageable rather than chaotic or overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10499169B2Automatically determined user experience value for hearing aid fitting
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 SONOVA AG
  • US10499169B2 patent drawing
  • US10499169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for adjusting a hearing device comprising: providing a user profile (42) of the user comprising actual user information (44) and a fitting history (47) stored in a database (34) of a fitting system (32), wherein the fitting history comprises fitting information (46, 46′, 46″) of at least one previous fitting session, in which previous fitting session the hearing device (10) or a different hearing device was adjusted for the user; determining a user experience value (54) of the user, wherein the user experience value (54) depends on the actual user information (44) and the fitting history (47); determining sound processing parameters (30) for the hearing device (10) based on the user experience value (54); and applying the determined sound processing parameters (30) in the hearing device (10), such that the hearing device (10) is adapted for generating optimized sound signals based on the applied sound processing parameters (30).