Hearing Aid Feedback Control Using Motion Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Acoustic feedback in hearing aids causes significant performance degradation due to the microphone and loudspeaker being placed closely together, leading to howling and sound quality degradation, especially during events like yawning and chewing, which are difficult to detect and control.

Innovation Solution

A hearing aid system that incorporates motion data to adjust feedback control, utilizing a feedback control unit assisted by motion data to detect and adapt to rapid changes in the acoustic feedback path, and employs a filler signal to smooth the sound output, reducing audible artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the microphone and loudspeaker are placed closely together in a hearing aid, then the device can be made compact and wearable, but acoustic feedback occurs causing howling and sound quality degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing aid sizeVSAvoidacoustic feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a feedback control system that acts as an intermediary between the microphone and loudspeaker. This system detects the acoustic feedback path and applies adaptive filtering to cancel the feedback signal before it reaches the microphone, thereby eliminating howling while maintaining the compact placement of audio components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism that continuously monitors the acoustic environment and adjusts the signal processing parameters in real-time. The system uses adaptive algorithms to track changes in the feedback path caused by user actions (yawning, chewing) and dynamically compensates for these changes, resolving the contradiction between compact design and feedback suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the feedback control system tries to detect and respond to rapid feedback path changes (e.g., during yawning or chewing), then feedback stability can be improved, but the system may be too slow to detect these rapid changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback stabilityVSAvoiddetection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs motion sensors to detect user movements (yawning, chewing, talking) before they cause significant feedback path changes. By detecting these preliminary motions, the system can proactively adjust the feedback control parameters in advance, ensuring stable feedback suppression even during rapid transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic feedback control system that adapts its detection and response characteristics based on the current operating conditions. The system switches between different detection modes and adjustment speeds depending on whether the user is stationary, talking, chewing, or yawning, thereby maintaining both reliability and responsiveness across all scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the hearing aid applies aggressive feedback suppression, then howling can be reduced, but audible artifacts and sound quality degradation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehowlingVSAvoidaudible artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback suppression selectively in specific frequency bands and time periods rather than uniformly across all frequencies. The system identifies which frequency bands are most prone to feedback and applies targeted suppression only to those bands, thereby eliminating howling while preserving overall sound quality and minimizing artifacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the feedback suppression parameters (filter coefficients, gain levels, time constants) based on the detected operating conditions and feedback characteristics. By continuously optimizing these parameters, the system achieves effective howling suppression while maintaining natural sound quality and avoiding audible artifacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12556869B2Motion data based signal processing
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 OTICON
  • US12556869B2 patent drawing
  • US12556869B2 patent drawing
  • US12556869B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hearing aid includes an input unit, an output unit, a signal processing unit connected to said input unit and output unit, where the input unit, the signal processing unit and the output unit are forming part of a forward path of the hearing aid, where the signal processing unit is configured to apply a forward gain to the at least one electric input signal or a signal originating therefrom. The hearing aid further includes a feedback control unit configured to reduce a risk of howl due to acoustic, electrical, and/or mechanical feedback of an external feedback path from the output unit to the input unit of said hearing aid, where the hearing aid is configured to receive motion data characterising movement and/or acceleration and/or orientation and/or position of the hearing aid to control processing.