Hearing Aid In Situ Fitting Using Server-Based Preference Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hearing aid personalization methods are challenging due to the difficulty in modeling user preferences and require significant processing and memory resources, especially in devices with limited capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An in situ fitting system that adapts hearing aid settings to user preferences using a server-connected method, employing clustering algorithms and probability distributions based on user data to optimize parameter settings without complex user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If parameterized approaches are used to model user preferences, then personalization capability is improved, but processing and memory requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidprocessing and memory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex parameterized modeling and clustering operations from the hearing aid device and relocates them to an external server. The device only retains lightweight functionality for collecting user feedback data and communicating with the server, thereby dramatically reducing processing and memory requirements while preserving personalization capability through server-based computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an external server as an intermediary between the user feedback and the hearing aid parameter adjustment. The server receives user feedback data, performs the computationally intensive clustering and parameter optimization, then transmits the optimized parameters back to the device. This intermediary handles the complex processing that would otherwise burden the limited device resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If complex user preference modeling is implemented, then personalization accuracy is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to complex user interaction requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoiduser interaction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the system automatically collects user feedback through simple interactions (such as liking or disliking sounds) and automatically processes this feedback through clustering algorithms to generate optimized parameters. The user does not need to understand or configure complex parameters manually; the system serves itself by translating simple user responses into sophisticated parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by implementing a simplified feedback mechanism that captures only the essential user preference information needed for personalization. Instead of requiring comprehensive user input, the system uses minimal interactions (e.g., simple like/dislike responses) that are then amplified through server-based clustering analysis to achieve accurate personalization without burdening the user with complex interaction requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12513478B2Method of operating an in situ fitting system and an in situ fitting system
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 WIDEX AS
  • US12513478B2 patent drawing
  • US12513478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (100) of operating an in situ fitting system adapted to provide improved user satisfaction with a hearing aid system and an in situ fitting system (200).