Hearing Aid Whistling Detection Using Average Frequency Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hearing aid technologies face challenges in effectively detecting and suppressing whistling, which limits maximum gain and can be annoying and harmful to users, due to inefficient methods that require significant processing power and may cause signal distortions.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the stability of the average frequency of an input signal by comparing differences in consecutive blocks, using a simple threshold-based approach to identify potential whistling, and employs a feedback cancellation filter to suppress it, while also adjusting gain to prevent whistling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a variance criterion is used to detect whistling, then whistling detection can be achieved, but processing power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewhistling detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from variance (second power calculation) to zero-crossing rate, which is a simpler arithmetic operation that requires much less processing power while maintaining effective whistling detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex arithmetical operations (variance calculation involving squaring) with simpler signal processing operations (zero-crossing detection), reducing computational complexity and processing power requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If a notch filter is used to suppress whistling, then whistling can be reduced, but signal distortions and audible changes occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewhistling suppressionVSAvoidsignal distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential characteristic of whistling (zero-crossing rate) for detection, avoiding the need for complex frequency filtering that causes distortions. The solution focuses on detecting and responding to the harmful characteristic without attempting to filter the entire signal spectrum

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic gain adjustment that adapts to the detected whistling conditions, allowing the system to respond flexibly to changing acoustic environments without imposing fixed frequency characteristics that would cause signal distortions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If gain is increased to compensate for hearing loss, then hearing aid effectiveness improves, but whistling becomes more likely to occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing compensation effectivenessVSAvoidwhistling probability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary detection of whistling conditions using zero-crossing rate analysis before whistling fully develops, allowing the system to take preventive action by reducing gain before the harmful feedback loop establishes itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the zero-crossing rate detection continuously monitors the audio signal and adjusts the gain accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to prevent whistling while maintaining hearing compensation effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9794695B2Detection of whistling in an audio system
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 GN HEARING AS
  • US9794695B2 patent drawing
  • US9794695B2 patent drawing
  • US9794695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting whistling in an audio system includes determining an average frequency of an input signal of the audio system, sampling the input signal in consecutive blocks of at least one sample, wherein the average frequency is determined blockwise, and determining whether feedback related whistling is present in the input signal of the audio system by evaluating a stability of the average frequency, wherein the evaluation of the stability of the average frequency comprises: determining a difference of two values of the determined average frequency for two blocks, and comparing the determined difference to a first threshold value.