Hearing Aid EEG Cognitive Load Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional hearing aid systems struggle to adapt processing modes to individual user needs, particularly in varying noise levels and cognitive loads, leading to inconsistent speech recognition and comprehension.

Innovation Solution

A hearing aid system that continuously monitors audio and EEG signals to determine deviation and cognitive load, switching between processing modes to optimize sound processing based on real-time user conditions, incorporating electrodes for brain activity measurement and adaptive algorithms for noise reduction and directionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple processing modes with different processing algorithms are implemented to handle varying noise levels, then speech intelligibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech intelligibilityVSAvoidprocessing mode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between different processing modes based on real-time cognitive load assessment. The audio input signal processing unit adapts its processing algorithm according to the user's current cognitive state, transitioning from static to dynamic operation to optimize speech intelligibility while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes processing parameters based on cognitive load levels. When cognitive load exceeds threshold values, the system modifies processing mode parameters such as noise reduction intensity, directionality settings, and compression levels to reduce the listening effort required, thereby maintaining speech intelligibility without requiring permanent complex processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If processing mode switches based on predefined signal-to-noise ratio thresholds are applied, then noise reduction is achieved, but adaptability to individual cognitive needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidindividual cognitive adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback from cognitive load assessment into the processing mode selection. The audio input signal analyzing unit continuously monitors cognitive load indicators and feeds this information back to the audio input signal processing unit, enabling real-time adaptation of noise processing strategies to individual cognitive needs rather than relying solely on predefined signal-to-noise ratio thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary cognitive load assessment to determine appropriate processing modes before processing the audio signal. By assessing cognitive load in advance and selecting processing modes proactively, the system can better adapt to individual cognitive needs and prevent cognitive overload rather than reactively adjusting after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If EEG monitoring and cognitive load assessment are continuously performed, then personalized processing is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized processingVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs cognitive load assessment periodically rather than continuously. The audio input signal analyzing unit evaluates cognitive load at specific intervals or triggered by certain conditions (such as detected speech segments or noise level changes), reducing the continuous monitoring burden while still providing personalized processing adjustments when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the user's own brain signals (EEG) as the assessment source, requiring no external equipment or additional power-intensive sensors. By leveraging endogenous biological signals that are already present, the system achieves personalized processing without adding external power consumption for additional sensing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If processing algorithms are adjusted based on cognitive load threshold values, then listening effort is reduced, but measurement precision of cognitive state deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelistening effortVSAvoidcognitive load measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial cognitive load measurement using a limited set of EEG features or simplified assessment metrics rather than comprehensive cognitive state analysis. By measuring only the most relevant cognitive load indicators (such as alpha band power or specific frequency components) rather than the full cognitive state, the system reduces listening effort while accepting reduced measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for personalized sound processing, improving speech recognition and comprehension by dynamically adjusting to changing noise levels and cognitive loads, enhancing the user experience by leveraging electrophysiological measures for adaptive hearing aid settings.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of electrodes that are configured to be brought into contact with the skin of a user and which are configured - when operationally mounted - to receive an electric signal that represents a user's brain activity and to provide a respective EEG-related signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroencephalogram (EEG):

Data Source

PatentEP3499914B1A hearing aid system
Publication Date: 2020.10.21 OTICON
  • EP3499914B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3499914B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3499914B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention refers to a hearing aid system that comprises an electric audio signal input, an audio input signal processing unit that is configured to process electric audio input signals in the first processing mode or in the second processing mode and to provide an electric audio output signal, and an output transducer. The hearing aid system further comprises an audio input signal analysing unit that is configured to continuously monitor the electric audio input signal as a function of time and to determine and to provide a number of audio signal values each representing a characteristic of the electric audio input signal at a given time instance. The hearing aid system further comprises a plurality of electrodes that are configured to be brought into contact with the skin of a user and which are configured - when operationally mounted - to receive an electric signal that rep-resents a user's brain activity and to provide a respective EEG-related signal. The hearing aid system further comprises an EEG-related signal analysing unit that is configured to continuously monitor the EEG-related signal as a function of time and to determine and to provide a number of EEG-related values each representing the EEG-related signal at a given time instance, a memory unit which is configured to store a number of audio signal values such that a first history of respective audio signal values is created and/or to store a number of EEG-related values such that a second history of respective EEG-related values is created and a signal comparison unit that is configured to compare a current audio signal value with at least one preceding audio signal value of the first history to determine and to provide a deviation signal and/or to compare a current EEG-related value with at least one preceding EEG-related value of the second history to determine a measure of a user's current cognitive load and to provide a cognitive load representing output signal accordingly. The audio input signal processing unit is further configured to apply the first processing mode or the at least second processing mode depending on said deviation signal and/or depending on said cognitive load representing output signal