Automated Hearing Device Selection via Subjective Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hearing assistance devices, such as hearing aids and Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAP), are complex and expensive, making it difficult for individuals with hearing impairments to select and obtain appropriate devices without professional assistance, leading to low adoption rates due to high costs and customization challenges.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that presents users with a series of questions to gather subjective responses, allowing for the automatic selection and recommendation of hearing devices based on their specific hearing needs, including options for amplifying high frequencies, reducing low frequencies, and addressing stress-related noise, thereby simplifying the selection process and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hearing aids provide adjustable operational parameters and processing types to customize performance, then hearing performance is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables consumers to self-administer the hearing screening and device selection process through an automated online platform, eliminating the need for professional audiologist intervention. The consumer completes hearing questions, receives automated screening results, and gets device recommendations independently, making the customization process self-service oriented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of in-person professional fitting with an automated computer-based screening and recommendation system. The online platform uses algorithms to process hearing responses and generate device recommendations, substituting the manual professional assessment process with an automated digital system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If hearing aids require professional fitting and customization, then hearing performance is improved, but time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing performanceVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables consumers to self-administer the hearing screening and device selection process through an automated online platform, eliminating the need for professional audiologist intervention. The consumer completes hearing questions, receives automated screening results, and gets device recommendations independently, making the customization process self-service oriented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary hearing screening and device recommendation actions before the consumer makes a purchase decision. The automated screening process evaluates hearing needs and pre-recommends suitable devices, allowing consumers to make informed decisions without requiring preliminary in-person professional appointments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If hearing aids are customized for specific hearing needs, then hearing performance is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing performanceVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables consumers to self-administer the hearing screening and device selection process through an automated online platform, eliminating the need for professional audiologist intervention. The consumer completes hearing questions, receives automated screening results, and gets device recommendations independently, making the customization process self-service oriented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential hearing screening and device selection functions from the professional service context and places them in an automated online platform. By separating these core functions from the need for professional involvement, the system reduces the cost component while maintaining the ability to provide customized hearing solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If PSAP provide sound amplification without professional assistance, then accessibility is improved, but selection accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidselection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual trial-and-error selection process with an automated computer-based screening system. The online platform uses algorithms to process hearing responses and generate accurate device recommendations, substituting the imprecise self-selection approach with a systematic automated assessment method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables consumers to self-administer the hearing screening and device selection process through an automated online platform, eliminating the need for professional audiologist intervention. The consumer completes hearing questions, receives automated screening results, and gets device recommendations independently, making the customization process self-service oriented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10332189B2System and method for consumer screening, selecting, recommending and/or selling hearing devices
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 SABLE SARA J
  • US10332189B2 patent drawing
  • US10332189B2 patent drawing
  • US10332189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system selects a hearing device from several different available hearing devices in response to screening a consumer by providing a plurality of questions regarding the consumer's hearing that each require a subjective response. The questions can include questions relating to hearing difficulty during one-on-one conversations, hearing difficulty during conversations with women and/or children, hearing difficulty during conversations in restaurants and/or meetings, and presence of stress and/or agitating sounds. The recommended hearing device is automatically selected for the consumer based at least in part on the subjective responses. The recommended hearing device provides enhancement of high frequencies if the responses indicate difficulty hearing women and/or children, provides reduction of low frequencies if the responses indicate difficulty hearing in restaurants and/or meetings, and provides phase cancellation if the responses indicate presence of stress and/or agitating sounds. The recommended hearing device is identified to the user for possible purchase.