Hearing Outcome Prediction Estimator Using ML

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is challenging for hearing specialists to objectively predict the potential hearing improvement a user may experience with a cochlear implant, as various factors such as age of onset of deafness, duration of deafness, and user anatomy can significantly affect performance, making it difficult to assure users of significant hearing improvement.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained using datasets from both hearing aid and cochlear implant systems, incorporating user and clinic data to predict hearing performance, allowing for objective and consistent predictions of hearing improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If hearing specialists rely on subjective assessment methods to predict hearing improvement, then the assessment process remains simple and quick, but the prediction accuracy and reliability deteriorate due to inability to objectively account for multiple factors affecting cochlear implant performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A machine learning model is introduced as an intermediary between the assessment data and prediction outcomes. The model processes multiple input factors (age of onset, duration of deafness, residual hearing, anatomical measurements) and outputs predicted hearing improvement metrics, thereby achieving objective and accurate predictions without requiring specialists to manually evaluate all factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The manual subjective assessment process is replaced with an automated computational system. Instead of specialists subjectively evaluating patients based on limited observations, the system uses algorithms to process objective measurements and generate predictions, substituting human judgment with machine-based analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple factors are considered in hearing improvement prediction, then the comprehensiveness of the assessment improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring these factors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment comprehensivenessVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves as a universal processing platform that can handle multiple different input types (audiometric data, anatomical measurements, patient history) through a single integrated system. This allows comprehensive assessment of all relevant factors without requiring separate evaluation procedures for each factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms various physical and clinical parameters (age, duration of deafness, residual hearing thresholds, cochlear dimensions) into a standardized format suitable for computational processing. By changing the representation of these parameters into numerical inputs, the system can efficiently process and integrate multiple factors simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230401483A1Hearing outcome prediction estimator
Publication Date: 2023.12.14 ADVANCED BIONICS AG
  • US20230401483A1 patent drawing
  • US20230401483A1 patent drawing
  • US20230401483A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An exemplary method includes a hearing performance prediction system aggregating a plurality of training examples, a training example in the plurality of training examples including a hearing aid dataset and a cochlear implant dataset associated with a user; and training a machine learning model using the plurality of training examples. The training may include computing, using the machine learning model, a predicted hearing performance for the user based on the hearing aid dataset of the user in the training example; computing a feedback value based on the predicted hearing performance of the user and the cochlear implant dataset of the user in the training example; and adjusting one or more model parameters of the machine learning model based on the feedback value.