Automatic Wax Guard Design for Hearing Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wax guard systems for hearing instruments are often manually generated through trial and error in 3D modeling, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies in fitting each individual ear, and lack adaptive algorithms for automatic positioning.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method using adaptive algorithms and feature recognition to automatically generate and position wax guards based on specific ear impressions, allowing for customizable wax guard systems with adjustable parameters for precise fitting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wax guard systems are manually generated through trial and error in 3D modeling, then flexibility in design exploration is maintained, but productivity and consistency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewax guard generation efficiencyVSAvoidmanual trial and error process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic wax guard generation using algorithms that independently analyze ear impression geometry and compute optimal wax guard designs without requiring manual iterative adjustments, thereby eliminating the trial-and-error process while maintaining design quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical 3D modeling process with an automated computational system that uses algorithms to generate wax guard designs, substituting human manual operations with automated software-based processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If empirical trial and error methods are used for wax guard design, then adaptability to individual ears is limited, but manufacturing simplicity is maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual ear adaptationVSAvoiddesign iteration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system tailors the wax guard design to each individual ear by analyzing specific geometric features of the ear impression and generating customized wax guard parameters that adapt to the unique characteristics of each patient's anatomy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent automatically adjusts wax guard design parameters based on the analyzed ear impression geometry, transforming fixed empirical designs into adaptive parameterized designs that optimize fit and protection for each individual case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If automated feature recognition algorithms are implemented for wax guard positioning, then positioning precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewax guard positioning accuracyVSAvoidalgorithmic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual positioning methods with automated feature recognition algorithms that computationally identify key anatomical features and calculate optimal wax guard positions, substituting human judgment with algorithmic precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital 3D representation of the ear impression and performs virtual positioning and visualization of the wax guard design on this digital model before manufacturing, allowing for precise positioning verification without physical trial-and-error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8135153B2Computerized automatic wax guard design modeling system and method for hearing instruments
Publication Date: 2012.03.13 SIVANTOS INC
  • US8135153B2 patent drawing
  • US8135153B2 patent drawing
  • US8135153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and appertaining system provide for automatically adding a wax guard to a hearing aid shell impression. The location of a canal, tip of the canal, and central line of the impression are automatically identified in a digital 3D representation of a hearing aid shell impression. A first wax guard plane is determined at a predefined flip distance from the canal tip along the central line, and a second wax guard plane is determined at a predefined canal tip offset distance from the canal tip along the central line. A size and position for a feature of the wax guard is calculated based on predefined parameters, and the wax guard is constructed utilizing the calculated side and position. The type of wax guard can be a bell bore design, an open design, a Philip design, or a flip design.