Heart-Shaped Craniosacral Cradle with Ovoid Recess
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing craniosacral support systems fail to provide safe, effective, and economical support for a supine patient's head, neck, shoulders, body, and sacrum during rest and therapy, lacking a comprehensive solution for craniosacral, massage, and manual therapy.
Innovation Solution
A craniosacral cradle system featuring a therapeutic tool made of integral skin polyurethane foam with calculated compression and resilience, designed with a heart-shaped base, rearward and forward supports, and an ovoid central recess, allowing for versatile positioning to mimic manual therapy techniques and promote relaxation and muscle release.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a craniosacral support system is designed to support multiple body parts (head, neck, shoulders, body, and sacrum), then the versatility and adaptability improve, but the device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The support system is divided into multiple independent positioning elements including head support, neck support, shoulder support, body support, and sacrum support. Each element can be independently adjusted and positioned to support different body parts, allowing the system to handle multiple therapeutic positions without requiring a completely different device structure.
Solution Approach 2:
The support system incorporates universal components that can serve multiple functions. The adjustable positioning elements can be configured to support various body parts (head, neck, shoulders, body, sacrum) depending on the therapeutic requirement, making a single device capable of performing multiple support functions that would otherwise require separate specialized devices.
2Reliability
If the support system provides comprehensive support for all body parts, then the reliability and safety improve, but the ease of operation decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The support system incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable elements that can be dynamically modified to match different patient body types and therapeutic requirements. The positioning elements can be easily adjusted during operation to optimize support and comfort, making the system adaptable rather than fixed, which improves both safety and ease of operation.
3Object-generated harmful factors
If the therapeutic tool uses integral skin polyurethane foam with specific compression properties, then the comfort and therapeutic effectiveness improve, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The support system utilizes polyurethane foam with specifically controlled compression and resilience parameters (Durometer 36-45 on Shore A scale, Indentation Force Deflection 8-9). These parameter specifications ensure the foam provides optimal comfort and therapeutic effectiveness by gently releasing muscle tension while maintaining structural integrity, balancing therapeutic benefits with manufacturability.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The cradle system effectively supports patients during craniosacral therapy, promoting deep relaxation, easing muscle tension, and providing a cost-effective, durable solution for craniosacral, massage, and manual therapy applications.
Implementation Method 1
The therapeutic tool has calculated compression and resilience. In the preferred embodiment, the therapeutic tool has a Durometer of from 36 to 45 on a Shore A scale and an Indentation Force Deflection of from 8 to 9.
Implementation Method 2
The therapeutic tool has calculated compression and resilience. In the preferred embodiment, the therapeutic tool has a Durometer of from 36 to 45 on a Shore A scale and an Indentation Force Deflection of from 8 to 9.
Data Source
AI summary
A formed therapeutic tool has a base in a generally heart-shaped configuration with a narrow arcuate front, a wide rear, tapering sides, and a concave bottom. A rearward support is formed of two similarly configured projections. The projections are laterally spaced. Each projection has a linear high point and a semicircular surface. The tool has a forward support formed of two similarly configured inclines. Each incline has an arcuate high point adjacent to one of the projections and an arcuate low point adjacent to the front. A ovoid shaped central recess extends downwardly between the inclines and the projections. The central recess terminates in an ovoid shaped floor with a lower surface constituting a portion of the concave bottom of the base. The tool having a Durometer of from 36 to 45 on a Shore A scale and an Indentation Force Deflection of from 8 to 9.