Accelerated Heart Valve Testing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for accelerated life testing of prosthetic heart valves, as outlined in ISO 5840-3:2013, require extensive testing cycles to ensure durability, which can be time-consuming and may lead to unrepresentative results due to overstress, and lack efficient visualization and adjustment capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system and method for accelerated life testing of prosthetic heart valves that includes a chamber assembly with adjustable return flow orifices, pressure sensors, and a machine vision system, allowing for high-speed testing, minimal pressure overshoot, and visual observation, while replicating physiological conditions and meeting ISO test requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If accelerated life testing is performed with high cycle rates to reduce test duration, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to overstress and unrepresentative results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest speedVSAvoidtest result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the pressure waveform in real-time during testing. The computer-controlled pressure source modifies pressure parameters based on feedback from sensors and vision systems, allowing the test to maintain physiological representativeness even at accelerated cycle rates. This dynamic adaptation prevents overstress while achieving faster test completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates multiple feedback mechanisms including pressure sensors that monitor transvalvular pressure differentials, vision systems that track valve motion, and computer-controlled adjustments. This closed-loop feedback ensures that accelerated testing maintains physiological accuracy by detecting and correcting deviations from representative valve behavior in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traditional pulsatile flow testers are used to meet ISO requirements, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to extended test durations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveISO complianceVSAvoidtest duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes key test parameters including pressure waveform characteristics, cycle frequency, and flow rates to achieve accelerated testing. By carefully controlling these parameter changes while maintaining physiological relationships, the system achieves ISO compliance in shorter durations. The computer-controlled pressure source enables precise parameter manipulation that traditional fixed-parameter testers cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic pressure waveforms that replicate physiological cardiac cycles but at accelerated frequencies. The pressure source generates repeating pressure patterns that simulate normal heart function, ensuring that each cycle represents a valid physiological event even at higher rates, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing total test time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If high pressure differentials are applied during testing to accelerate wear, then productivity is improved, but object-generated harmful factors increase due to overstress and artificial failure modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest accelerationVSAvoidoverstress artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies pressure differentials that are partially elevated compared to normal physiological conditions, but not excessively so. The computer-controlled pressure source adjusts pressure to achieve accelerated testing while maintaining pressure gradients that represent actual valve operating conditions, preventing artificial failure modes caused by excessive stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure differential is dynamically adjusted during each cardiac cycle and across different test phases. The system modifies pressure parameters in real-time based on valve position, flow conditions, and accumulated cycle counts, ensuring that acceleration is achieved without sustained overstress that would create artificial failure artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient, high-speed testing that meets ISO requirements with minimal overstress, allows for visual analysis, and is configurable to simulate physiological conditions, thereby shortening test duration and improving the accuracy of valve durability assessment.

Implementation Method 1

an oscillating fluid pump having an interior volume that is changeable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid displacement: Pump

Implementation Method 2

a first pressure sensor configured to measure a liquid pressure within the proximal interior space and a second pressure sensor configured to measure a liquid pressure within the distal interior space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10105227B2System for testing valves
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 TA INSTRUMENTS WATERS LLC
  • US10105227B2 patent drawing
  • US10105227B2 patent drawing
  • US10105227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document provides systems and methods for testing of various kinds of valves. For example, this document provides systems and methods for accelerated life testing of prosthetic heart valves.