Heat exchanger core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The performance of heat exchange in corrugated-fin-type heat exchangers with louvers cut and raised in one direction is limited, and air flow stagnation occurs at the ends of the core, leading to increased air flow resistance.

Innovation Solution

The core height, cutting and raising louver width, and louver angle are optimized to satisfy the inequality H > Qup/(Qup−1)×ΔH, where Qup = α(W) + β(W,θ) + 1, α(W) = η/(W−η), β(W,θ) = ξ/(W·tan2 2θ−ξ), and ΔH = j·W(sin θ+k·sin2 θ), to improve heat exchange performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If louvers are cut and raised in one direction only, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but air flow stagnation occurs at end portions increasing air flow resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelouver configuration complexityVSAvoidair flow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing space portions at specific locations (above and below the core at end portions) rather than uniformly throughout. This localized structural modification addresses the air flow stagnation problem only where it occurs, maintaining simple one-directional louver configuration elsewhere while reducing harmful air flow resistance effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If core height and louver dimensions are not optimized, then manufacturing is simpler, but heat exchange performance is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange performanceVSAvoidparameter optimization requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific mathematical relationships between core height H, louver width W, and louver angle θ through inequalities (H>Qup/(Qup−1)×ΔH, Qup=Qup(W,θ)=α(W)+β(W,θ)+1, ΔH=ΔH(W,θ)=j·W(sin θ+k·sin2 θ)). These optimized parameter ranges enable improved heat exchange performance while providing clear manufacturing guidelines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This optimization enhances the heat transfer ratio while minimizing the air-flow reduced region, resulting in improved heat exchange performance compared to conventional multi-directional louver fins.

Implementation Method 1

a number of flat tubes and a number of corrugated fins alternately aligned in parallel to each other to flow first fluid in the tubes, and flow second fluid on an outer face side of the tubes and in the corrugated fins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

flow second fluid on an outer face side of the tubes and in the corrugated fins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS10309729B2Heat exchanger core
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 T RAD CO LTD
  • US10309729B2 patent drawing
  • US10309729B2 patent drawing
  • US10309729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A corrugated fin heat exchanger is provided in which the direction in which louvers are cut and raised is inclined in one direction only, and in which heat transfer performance is improved above that of conventional fins. To accomplish this, the relationship H>Qup/(Qup−1)×ΔH is satisfied.H represents the core height of the heat exchanger,Qup represents the ratio of the amount of heat exchanged per corrugation between one-directional louver fins and multi-directional louver fins in an airflow part,and ΔH represents the amount of increase in a heat transfer reduction region of a heat exchanger core as a result of changing from multi-directional louver fins to one-directional louver fins.