Probabilistic Heat Exchanger Degradation Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing degradation in large heat exchangers, such as nuclear steam generators, are inefficient in addressing interdependent degradation modes like tube deposit heat-transfer fouling, corrosion, and blockages, leading to reduced thermal efficiency and increased costs due to deterministic calculations that neglect uncertainties.

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic evaluation method is applied to assess the progression of multiple interdependent degradation modes and their economic consequences, allowing for simultaneous evaluation of various remediation strategies that account for systematic and random uncertainties, providing quantitative probabilities for outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deterministic calculations are used to evaluate remediation strategies, then the evaluation process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of the results deteriorate due to neglecting uncertainties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces deterministic calculation methods with probabilistic evaluation methods that incorporate uncertainty analysis. This substitution transforms the evaluation approach from simple but inaccurate deterministic models to more complex probabilistic models that provide accurate results with quantified confidence levels, directly resolving the contradiction between accuracy and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where evaluation results are used to refine and update the probabilistic models. This continuous refinement process improves accuracy over time while managing complexity through iterative optimization, allowing the system to learn from data and reduce uncertainty in future evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple interdependent degradation modes are evaluated simultaneously, then the comprehensiveness of the evaluation improves, but the computational complexity and time required worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into distinct modules, each handling specific degradation modes (fouling, corrosion, blockages). These modular components can be evaluated independently and then integrated, reducing the computational burden compared to evaluating all modes simultaneously while maintaining comprehensive assessment of interdependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary assessments of individual degradation modes before conducting the full integrated evaluation. This preliminary action identifies critical areas requiring detailed analysis, allowing the system to focus computational resources on the most impactful factors and reduce overall evaluation time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If probabilistic methods are used to account for uncertainties, then the reliability of predictions improves, but the complexity of data processing and analysis worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses simplified probabilistic models and standardized data structures that replicate complex uncertainty relationships in a manageable format. By creating simplified representations of uncertainty propagation, the system maintains prediction reliability while reducing the actual computational and data processing complexity required to implement and analyze the models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9841184B2Method and apparatus for evaluating repair and remediation alternatives for heat exchangers
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 DOMINION ENGINEERING INC
  • US9841184B2 patent drawing
  • US9841184B2 patent drawing
  • US9841184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for evaluating simultaneously the effects of multiple, interdependent heat-exchanger degradation modes for a heat exchanger of a power plant in the context of a series of alternative heat-exchanger remediation strategies. The method includes calculating time-varying predicted future progressions of heat exchanger performance metrics for a plurality of alternative heat-exchanger remediation strategies, and calculating time-varying predicted future progressions of financial metrics describing the accumulated financial benefit of each of the strategies. The calculations may be provided in probabilistic terms. A strategy may then be chosen based, at least in part, on the calculated results.