Heat Exchanger Feed-Forward Flow Control for Part-Load Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional HVAC systems are inflexible and inefficient, particularly at part-load conditions, leading to instability, poor occupant comfort, and resource wastage due to improper equipment selection and maintenance schedules, with issues like fouling in heat exchangers requiring manual disassembly and inefficient maintenance processes.

Innovation Solution

A heat transfer system with a heat exchanger and variable control pumps, using sensors and a controller to detect variables and adjust flow using a feed-forward control loop, allowing for real-time maintenance and optimization of energy consumption, and automatic flushing to address fouling, thereby improving system efficiency and reducing maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional feedback control with remote sensors is used to control pumps, then the system can achieve specific load requirements, but the system responds slowly and is inflexible for different setups and requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The feed forward control system calculates and adjusts pump speeds in advance based on predicted load requirements and system characteristics, rather than waiting for feedback from remote sensors. This preliminary action enables the system to respond immediately to changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance across different configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If equipment is selected for full capacity operation, then the system can handle extreme conditions, but the pumping system becomes susceptible to instability and energy wastage at part-load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs variable speed drives on pumps that dynamically adjust operating speeds based on real-time feed forward calculations of actual load requirements. This dynamic operation allows pumps to maintain stable, efficient operation across the entire operating range from part-load to full-capacity, eliminating the instability and energy wastage associated with fixed-speed operation at part-load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The feed forward control system continuously adjusts critical parameters such as pump speed, flow rate, and pressure settings based on predicted system needs. By changing these parameters proactively rather than reactively, the system maintains optimal efficiency and stability across varying load conditions without requiring oversized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If manual maintenance is performed on heat exchangers, then contaminants can be removed, but the system requires shutdown and disassembly which is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefouling removalVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates self-cleaning capabilities through automated flushing operations triggered by the feed forward control system. Sensors detect fouling conditions and the controller automatically initiates flushing sequences that clean heat exchangers in-place without requiring system shutdown or disassembly. This self-service approach maintains productivity while effectively removing contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The feed forward control system monitors heat exchanger conditions and initiates cleaning operations before fouling becomes severe enough to impact system performance. This preliminary maintenance action prevents the buildup of significant contaminants while avoiding the need for extensive manual intervention and system shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If fixed schedule maintenance is used for heat exchangers, then maintenance can be performed regularly, but there is risk of over-maintenance or under-maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance consistencyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to continuously monitor heat exchanger conditions such as differential pressure, temperature differentials, and flow rates. This real-time feedback is fed into the feed forward control algorithm, which adjusts maintenance scheduling based on actual fouling rates and system performance. This ensures maintenance is performed consistently when needed without unnecessary over-maintenance or dangerous under-maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The maintenance schedule transitions from a static fixed timetable to a dynamic schedule that adapts to actual system conditions. The feed forward control system continuously updates maintenance requirements based on real-time sensor data and predicted fouling progression, optimizing the timing and frequency of maintenance operations to match actual needs rather than arbitrary schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages variable loads, reduces energy consumption, and minimizes maintenance through automatic detection and correction of fouling, enhancing both operational efficiency and occupant comfort by optimizing pump operation and maintenance schedules.

Implementation Method 1

a heat exchanger is used to transfer heat energy between two or more circuits of circulation mediums

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

sensors for detecting variables, the sensors comprising first at least one sensor for sensing at least one variable indicative of the first circulation medium and second at least one sensor for sensing at least one variable indicative of the second circulation medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Implementation Method 3

controlling flow of one or both of the first variable control pump or the variable flow controlling mechanical device using a feed forward control loop based on the detected variables

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFeed forward control:

Data Source

PatentEP3861272B1Feed forward flow control of heat transfer system
Publication Date: 2024.04.10 SA ARMSTRONG LTD
  • EP3861272B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3861272B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3861272B1 patent drawingFigure 1C~1D

AI summary

A heat transfer system that includes one or more heat exchangers and one or more variable control pumps that control flow through the one or more heat exchangers. At least one variable control pump is on the source side of the heat exchanger for controlling flow of a first circulation medium and at least one flow controlling mechanical device is on the load side of the heat exchanger for controlling flow of a second circulation medium. Sensors are used for detecting variables of the first circulation medium and the second circulation medium. At least one controller is configured to control at least one parameter of the first circulation medium or the second circulation medium by controlling at least one of the variable control pump or the flow controlling mechanical device using a feed forward control loop calculated from the detected variables to achieve control of the at least one parameter.