Multi-Layer Heat Pipe Module for Low-Resistance Airflow Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat sinks face limitations in heat dissipation efficiency due to fixed gaps and unified airflow passage lengths, leading to heat accumulation and structural weakness, especially with increased electronic component performance, and stacking heat sinks results in deformation of radiating fins.

Innovation Solution

A thermal module design featuring a base seat with heat pipes and misaligned, multi-layered heat dissipation units with adjustable airflow passages, enhancing heat dissipation area and preventing airflow interruption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the number of radiating fins is increased to enlarge heat dissipation area, then the heat dissipation area is improved, but the gap between adjacent radiating fins is reduced and airflow resistance is enlarged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation areaVSAvoidairflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional planar arrangement of radiating fins to a three-dimensional spatial configuration by introducing varying heights and staggered positions. The first and second radiating fins extend in different directions from the heat dissipation base, creating vertical and horizontal dimensionality. This dimensional change allows airflow to pass through multiple levels and directions, reducing resistance while maintaining large heat dissipation area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric design where the first radiating fin and second radiating fin have different orientations, heights, and positions relative to the heat dissipation base. The first radiating fin extends in a first direction while the second radiating fin extends in a second direction that is different from the first direction. This asymmetry creates non-uniform airflow paths that reduce resistance compared to symmetric uniform arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Area of stationary object

If the height or length of radiating fins is increased to enlarge heat dissipation area, then the heat dissipation area is improved, but the radiating fins become thin and are prone to deformation or damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation areaVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of simply increasing the height or length of single-plane radiating fins, the patent introduces a three-dimensional configuration with radiating fins extending in multiple directions and at different heights from the base. This dimensional approach increases heat dissipation area without requiring excessive height in any single fin, thereby maintaining structural strength and resistance to deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat dissipation structure is segmented into multiple independent radiating fins (first radiating fin, second radiating fin, etc.) that extend in different directions. Rather than using fewer, taller fins, the total heat dissipation area is divided into multiple shorter segments arranged spatially. This segmentation reduces the height requirement for each individual fin while achieving the same or greater total heat dissipation area, thereby improving structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Area of stationary object

If two independent heat sinks are stacked to increase heat dissipation area, then the heat dissipation area is improved, but the upper heat sink applies pressure to the radiating fins of the lower heat sink causing deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation areaVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple radiating fins extending in different directions and at different heights from a single heat dissipation base into one unified structure, rather than stacking separate heat sinks vertically. This three-dimensional integration achieves large heat dissipation area without the need for vertical stacking that would impose compressive loads on the lower fins, thereby maintaining their structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple radiating fins (first radiating fin, second radiating fin, etc.) into a single integrated heat dissipation structure that shares a common base. This unified structure eliminates the need for separate stacked heat sinks, thereby removing the compressive pressure issue while maintaining the combined heat dissipation area of all fins working together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If the thickness of radiating fins is increased to improve structural strength, then the structural strength is improved, but the number of radiating fins is reduced and heat dissipation area decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidheat dissipation area
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by moving from a two-dimensional planar arrangement to a three-dimensional spatial configuration. Multiple radiating fins with moderate thickness can be arranged in different directions and heights, increasing the total heat dissipation area without requiring increased thickness of individual fins. The spatial arrangement allows more fins to coexist with adequate spacing, maintaining both structural strength and large heat dissipation area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the heat dissipation function into multiple thin radiating fins arranged in different spatial directions rather than using fewer thick fins. Each fin maintains sufficient thickness for structural strength, while the segmented multi-directional arrangement achieves large total heat dissipation area. This segmentation allows optimization of individual fin thickness for strength while the collective arrangement maximizes surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively enlarges heat dissipation area and improves airflow flow, resulting in enhanced heat dissipation efficiency and structural stability.

Implementation Method 1

Each heat pipe has a heat absorption end and a heat dissipation end outward extending from the heat absorption end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat pipe: Heat Pipe

Implementation Method 2

the heat sink contacts and is attached to a heat source (such as a central processing unit or a graphics processing chip) for conducting the heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

the radiating fins of the heat sink outward dissipate the heat by way of radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 4

the radiating fins of the heat sink outward dissipate the heat by way of radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS12446192B2Thermal module
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO LTD
  • US12446192B2 patent drawing
  • US12446192B2 patent drawing
  • US12446192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A thermal module includes a base seat, at least two heat pipes and multiple heat dissipation units. Each heat pipe has a heat absorption end and a heat dissipation end outward extending from the heat absorption end. The heat absorption ends are disposed on the base seat. The heat dissipation ends of the at least two heat pipes are positioned above the base seat at different heights and misaligned from each other. The multiple heat dissipation units are connected with the heat dissipation ends of the heat pipes and arranged at intervals. By means of arranging the multiple heat dissipation unit at intervals as multiple layers, the heat dissipation areas is enlarged to prevent the airflow from being interrupted so as to effectively greatly enhance the heat dissipation efficiency.