Heat Pump Defrost Triggering Based on Capacity Demand Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Frost accumulation on the evaporator of split heat pump systems reduces heating efficiency by obstructing air flow and heat transfer, necessitating periodic defrost cycles that are often triggered too late, leading to reliance on auxiliary heaters.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining the optimal initiation of a defrost mode by monitoring the heating capacity of the heat exchanger, transitioning from heating to defrost when the capacity falls below specific thresholds, and using sensors to track refrigerant mass flow, pressure, and temperature to ensure timely defrosting, thereby reducing auxiliary heater usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If defrost cycle is performed periodically to remove frost accumulation, then heating efficiency is improved, but system productivity deteriorates due to frequent mode switching and capacity loss during defrost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidsystem productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by initiating defrost mode before frost accumulation significantly impacts heating capacity. The controller monitors capacity demand and compares it against dynamically adjusted thresholds, triggering defrost when thresholds are approached, thereby preventing severe frost buildup that would require more intensive defrost cycles and cause greater productivity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by making defrost thresholds adaptive rather than fixed. The controller dynamically adjusts the first and second thresholds based on capacity demand conditions, allowing the system to optimize the balance between maintaining heating efficiency and minimizing defrost frequency. When capacity demand is high, thresholds are set to prevent defrost unless necessary; when demand is low, thresholds allow more frequent defrost to prevent capacity degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If defrost is delayed until capacity loss is significant, then system productivity is maintained, but heating efficiency deteriorates requiring auxiliary heater usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem productivityVSAvoidheating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring heating capacity and comparing it against dynamically set thresholds. The controller receives feedback on capacity demand conditions and adjusts defrost triggering accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that defrost is initiated at the optimal moment - before capacity loss becomes severe enough to require auxiliary heating, yet not so early that unnecessary defrost cycles reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by dynamically modifying defrost thresholds based on operating conditions. Rather than using fixed capacity thresholds, the controller adjusts the first and second thresholds according to real-time capacity demand, enabling the system to maintain both high productivity and high heating efficiency across varying operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If auxiliary heater is used to compensate for capacity loss, then heating efficiency is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By initiating defrost cycles before frost accumulation severely impacts capacity, the system prevents the need for auxiliary heater intervention. This preliminary defrost action maintains heat exchanger efficiency without requiring additional energy-intensive auxiliary heating, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while preserving heating reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach optimizes defrost cycle timing, enhancing heating efficiency and reducing the need for auxiliary heating by initiating defrost mode before significant capacity loss, thus maintaining system performance and energy efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The result is that the refrigerant warms the evaporator, thereby eliminating, or at least reducing, any accumulated frost

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20240337400A1Method of triggering defrost
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 CARRIER CORP
  • US20240337400A1 patent drawing
  • US20240337400A1 patent drawing
  • US20240337400A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining when to initiate a defrost mode of a heat pump includes monitoring a heating capacity of a heat exchanger of the heat pump during operation of the heat pump in a heating mode, initiating the defrost mode when the heating capacity of the heat exchanger is less than or equal to a reduced defrost threshold when a capacity demand of the heat exchanger is less than a maximum capacity demand, and initiating the defrost mode when the heating capacity of the heat exchanger is less than or equal to a maximum defrost threshold when the capacity demand of the heat exchanger is equal to the maximum capacity demand.