Heat Sink Coolant Passageway Layout for Temperature Bias Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heat sinks with oblong slits in the coolant flow direction experience temperature bias, leading to reduced heat-exchanging efficiency and cooling performance due to a small temperature difference between the core and coolant.

Innovation Solution

A heat sink design with a coolant passageway that includes coolant-contact parts, coolant-transit parts, and connecting parts with varying cross-sectional areas, which agitates the coolant by increasing and decreasing in size along the flow path, reducing temperature bias and enhancing heat transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If oblong slits extended along the coolant flow direction are used in the heat sink core, then the coolant can flow smoothly through the heat sink, but temperature bias occurs in the coolant leading to reduced heat-exchanging efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant flow smoothnessVSAvoidheat-exchanging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The coolant passageway is segmented into multiple functional sections: coolant lead-in part, coolant-contact parts, coolant-transit part, and connecting parts. This segmentation allows different sections to perform specialized functions - the connecting parts with smaller cross-sectional areas create agitation zones that mix the coolant, while the coolant-contact parts provide thermal exchange surfaces, thereby resolving the contradiction between smooth flow and temperature uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the coolant passageway are given different local qualities - the connecting parts have smaller cross-sectional areas to create turbulence and agitation, while the coolant-contact parts have larger areas for thermal exchange. This local differentiation allows the system to achieve both smooth overall flow and localized mixing to prevent temperature bias.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Temperature

If the temperature difference between the core and coolant becomes small due to temperature bias, then the coolant temperature becomes more uniform, but heat-exchanging efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant temperature uniformityVSAvoidheat-exchanging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting parts with smaller cross-sectional areas create periodic agitation zones along the coolant flow path. As coolant passes through these alternating narrow and wide sections, it experiences periodic turbulence and mixing that prevents temperature stratification while maintaining overall flow continuity, thus preserving both temperature uniformity and heat exchange efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of energy

If connecting parts with smaller passageway cross-sectional areas are introduced between coolant-transit part and coolant-contact parts, then coolant agitation is improved and temperature bias is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature biasVSAvoidcoolant passageway structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting parts are integrated directly into the coolant passageway structure, merging the agitation function with the flow path rather than adding separate agitation devices. This integration achieves coolant mixing through the passageway geometry itself, reducing device complexity while still improving temperature uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design improves cooling performance by increasing the temperature difference between the heat sink and coolant, leading to more efficient heat exchange and reduced pressure loss.

Implementation Method 1

the coolant passageway can agitate with good efficiency the coolant that has flowed into the coolant-contact part owing to the increase/decrease of the size of the passageway

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAgitation: Stirring

Implementation Method 2

When the coolant is flowed through the heat sink, owing to heat exchange with the heat sink, the temperature of the coolant that flows through a portion of the heat sink that is close to the inner surface becomes higher

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS11935815B2Heat sink and heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 UACJ CORP
  • US11935815B2 patent drawing
  • US11935815B2 patent drawing
  • US11935815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coolant passageway (2) of a heat sink (1) has a coolant lead-in part (21), a coolant lead-out part (22), coolant-contact parts (23), coolant-transit parts (25), and connecting parts (24). The coolant-contact parts (23) are disposed spaced apart from one another along a coolant path leading from the coolant lead-in part (21) to the coolant lead-out part (22) and are configured such that they bring the coolant into contact with a cooling-wall part. The coolant-transit parts (25) are disposed between adjacent coolant-contact parts (23) and are configured such that the coolant can transit from upstream-side coolant-contact parts (23) to downstream-side coolant-contact parts (23) in the coolant paths. The connecting parts (24) are interposed between the coolant-transit parts (25) and the coolant-contact parts (23) and have a passageway cross-sectional area that is smaller than those of the coolant-contact parts (23) and the coolant-transit parts (25).