Heater Control for Diesel Aftertreatment Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The control of heater systems in diesel engine aftertreatment systems faces challenges due to long lead times and large thermal inertia, which can result in inefficient NOx conversion and increased fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

A control system is implemented that includes a dynamic response system to account for long lead times and thermal inertia, allowing for a faster response without stability issues, by adjusting the heating power setpoint based on feedback and dynamic modeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a heater system is used to heat the aftertreatment system to operating temperature, then the SCR conversion efficiency is improved, but the fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSCR conversion efficiencyVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies preliminary heating action by activating the heater system before the engine reaches operating temperature, ensuring the aftertreatment system is pre-heated to the required level. This preliminary action allows the SCR catalyst to be ready for efficient operation as soon as exhaust flow is sufficient, minimizing the period of low conversion efficiency and reducing the total heating energy required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors the temperature of the aftertreatment system and adjusts the heater power accordingly. When the target temperature is approached, the heating power is reduced or switched off, preventing overheating and unnecessary fuel consumption. This feedback mechanism ensures optimal balance between achieving sufficient SCR conversion efficiency and minimizing additional fuel usage for heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the heater system is controlled with conventional PID control, then the control simplicity is maintained, but the response time is slow due to long lead times and thermal inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates a model of the aftertreatment system's thermal behavior that predicts future temperature based on current heating power and system state. This preliminary modeling action allows the controller to anticipate the system's response and adjust heating power proactively, compensating for the inherent delays and thermal inertia without requiring complex adaptive control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediate control model or lookup table is introduced between the simple PID controller and the heater system. This intermediary translates the simple PID error signal into appropriate heating power commands that account for system delays and thermal inertia, effectively decoupling the simplicity of the controller from the complexity of the system dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If the target temperature is set closer to the SCR light-off temperature, then the fuel penalty is reduced, but the control stability becomes more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel penaltyVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies different control strategies at different temperature ranges. When the aftertreatment system temperature is below the SCR light-off temperature, aggressive heating is applied to reach the target quickly. Once the target temperature (close to light-off) is approached, the control becomes more conservative with smaller heating steps to prevent overshooting. This localized adaptation of control quality maintains stability while achieving fuel-efficient operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control system anticipates potential temperature overshoot by reducing heating power in advance before the target temperature is reached. This preliminary anti-action counteracts the thermal inertia that would otherwise cause the temperature to continue rising past the desired setpoint, maintaining control stability even when operating close to the SCR light-off temperature with minimal fuel penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more efficient control of the heater system, ensuring sufficient SCR conversion while minimizing fuel consumption and maintaining stable operation.

Implementation Method 1

an electrical heater

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

a fuel burner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

a catalytic converter more specifically an SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) catalyst that converts NOx into harmless products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) catalyst that converts NOx into harmless products also known as the deNOx process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective catalytic reduction: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 5

a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) to (inter alia) increase the deNOX efficiency and oxydize unburned hydrocarbon and CO

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12228060B2Heater control for an after treatment system
Publication Date: 2025.02.18 DAF TRUCKS NV
  • US12228060B2 patent drawing
  • US12228060B2 patent drawing
  • US12228060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system is arranged to control the heater system; wherein the control system is programmed to heat the exhaust after treatment system based on a setpoint value. The control system comprises a controller having an error input and an output; that outputs a heating power setpoint value that is adjusted by a feedback signal, said adjusted setpoint value provided in parallel to a branch including the heater system and a branch including a dynamic response system. The dynamic response system comprises a dynamic response part and a delay part. A first subtractor subtracts a measured heat output and an output of the dynamic response system; an adder adds an output of the dynamic response part and an output of the first subtractor. A second subtractor subtracts a heating power setpoint from the output of the adder to provide a control error signal for the error input of the controller.