Heater Resistance-Rate Detection for Dry Aerosol Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aerosol-generating systems face challenges in reliably detecting the dry state of heating elements, which can lead to overheating and disruption, due to small changes in electrical resistance and manufacturing variations among heating elements.

Innovation Solution

A method that monitors the electrical resistance ratio ΔR/Δt of the heating element over a predefined time interval, calculates a rolling average, and compares it with a threshold value, using a statistically significant increase to determine adverse conditions and prevent overheating by controlling the power supply.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If absolute resistance values are monitored to detect dry state, then detection capability is provided, but the small changes (few milliohms) are difficult to identify reliably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidreliability of detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the detection parameter from absolute resistance values (R) to resistance change rate (ΔR/Δt). This parameter transformation amplifies the detectable signal: while absolute resistance changes are only a few milliohms, the rate of change becomes a more pronounced indicator of dry state. The controller calculates ΔR/Δt by comparing resistance values across multiple time points, converting subtle absolute changes into a more reliable detection metric that overcomes the limitation of small milliohm variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If heater temperature is raised substantially to detect resistance change, then dry state detection is enabled, but energy consumption increases and detection time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using minimal temperature variations during normal operation to detect resistance changes, rather than substantially raising the temperature. The system monitors ΔR/Δt during routine heating cycles, utilizing small natural temperature fluctuations to generate detectable resistance changes. This approach enables dry state detection without the excessive energy consumption that would result from deliberate substantial temperature increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If initial heater resistance is detected as a reference, then resistance change detection is possible, but manufacturing variations cause inaccurate baseline comparison

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference detectionVSAvoidmanufacturing variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by not using absolute resistance values or initial resistance as the reference baseline. Instead of comparing measured resistance against a fixed reference value (which suffers from manufacturing variations), the system compares the rate of resistance change (ΔR/Δt) against dynamically updated reference ranges. These reference ranges are established through multiple measurements during normal operation, automatically adapting to each specific heating element's characteristics and eliminating the need for precise manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If rolling average of resistance ratio is calculated across multiple heating cycles, then detection reliability is improved, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-establishing reference ranges for ΔR/Δt during initial operation phases. The system performs multiple measurements during normal operation to determine the mean and standard deviation, creating a reference range before actual dry state detection begins. This preliminary calibration phase allows the system to use simple comparison logic (is ΔR/Δt outside the reference range?) during operation, rather than performing complex rolling average calculations in real-time, thus reducing processing time while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively detects the dry state of heating elements before they reach harmful temperatures, preventing overheating and disruption, and ensuring reliable operation across different types of heating elements.

Implementation Method 1

an electrical heating element... Upon heating to a target temperature, the aerosol-generating substrate vaporises

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

detect a change in the resulting electrical resistance... determine an electrical resistance ratio ΔR/Δt of the heating element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance-temperature relationship: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS20240365877A1Dry heater detection for aerosol-generating system
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS SA
  • US20240365877A1 patent drawing
  • US20240365877A1 patent drawing
  • US20240365877A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a supply of power to a heating element in an electrically operated aerosol-generating system is provided, the method including: regulating the supply of power to the heating element during discrete heating cycles; determining an electrical resistance ratio of the heating element for a predefined time interval during a heating cycle; calculating a rolling average value of the electrical resistance ratio for n preceding heating cycles, n being an integer greater than 1; comparing the electrical resistance ratio with the calculated rolling average value; determining an adverse condition when the electrical resistance ratio is greater than the calculated rolling average value by more than a threshold value; and controlling power supplied to the heating element based on whether an adverse condition at the heating element is determined, the threshold value for determining an adverse condition being determined from a standard deviation of the electrical resistance ratio.