Multi-State Heater Control for Faster Heating With Lower Energy Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thermostats for heaters operate inefficiently by maintaining full power until the desired temperature is reached, leading to excessive energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A heater with multiple power states and corresponding control states, managed by a finite state machine and temperature sensor, which adjusts power levels based on ambient temperature thresholds, allowing for efficient energy use by transitioning between high, low, and stand-by states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the heater operates at full power to quickly reach the desired temperature, then the heating speed is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The heater dynamically adjusts its power output based on the temperature difference between the current ambient temperature and the setpoint temperature. When the temperature difference is large, the heater operates at high power to quickly reduce the gap. As the temperature approaches the setpoint, the power is automatically reduced to maintain the temperature without excessive energy consumption. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making the heating speed adaptive rather than constant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the power level parameter from a fixed full-power state to a variable state that depends on the temperature condition. The control circuitry monitors the temperature continuously and modifies the power delivery parameter accordingly, switching between high power, medium power, and low power states. This parameter change allows the heater to achieve fast heating when needed while conserving energy when the temperature is close to the target.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the heater continuously operates at high power to maintain temperature, then the temperature stability is improved, but energy waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature stabilityVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heater employs periodic on-off cycles with varying durations based on the temperature proximity to the setpoint. Instead of continuous operation, the heater turns on for specific periods to provide heating, then turns off to allow the temperature to stabilize naturally. The duration and frequency of these periodic actions are adjusted according to how close the temperature is to the target, reducing energy waste while maintaining stability through controlled intermittent heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial heating action rather than full power continuously. When the temperature is close to the setpoint, only minimal heating action is applied just enough to maintain the temperature, avoiding excessive energy consumption. The control strategy uses just-sufficient heating rather than maximum heating, achieving temperature stability with minimal energy input by applying heat only when and to the extent needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Use of energy by moving object

If the heater uses multiple power states and state transitions, then energy efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct operational states (high power state, medium power state, low power state, and stand-by state) with clearly defined transition conditions. Each state has specific temperature thresholds for entering and exiting, which simplifies the control logic within each state while achieving complex overall behavior through the combination of states. This segmentation makes the system easier to implement and debug compared to a fully continuous control approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the temperature sensor to automatically determine state transitions. The temperature reading feeds back to the control circuitry, which compares it against predefined thresholds and automatically switches states accordingly. This feedback mechanism eliminates the need for complex user input or manual adjustments, allowing the heater to autonomously optimize its energy consumption while maintaining simple operation for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the heater to operate at optimal power levels, reducing energy consumption by adjusting power states according to ambient temperature, thereby conserving energy while maintaining a set temperature range.

Implementation Method 1

a temperature sensor for measuring an ambient temperature and generating a corresponding temperature signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 2

a heating unit for generating thermal energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy generation: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9605873B2Heater with energy-saving operations and method related thereto
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 KAZ EUROPE SA
  • US9605873B2 patent drawing
  • US9605873B2 patent drawing
  • US9605873B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A heater includes a heating unit that supports at least a high-power state, a low-power state and a stand-by state. A control circuitry of the heater implements a state machine to control the heating unit, with respective states in the state machine corresponding to power states in the heating unit. The transition from a first state to a second state in the state machine is determined by a comparison between a measured ambient temperature with a predetermined threshold temperature for transitioning from the first state to the second state.