Electric Heater Ramp-Up Control Under Current Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thermal systems with resistive heating elements face inefficiencies in reaching temperature setpoints due to standard ramp rates, leading to non-productive manufacturing time and potential overheating or underheating issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and control system that apply power to resistive heating elements at a variable ramp rate, monitoring electric current and adjusting the ramp rate based on current limits to prevent overheating, while also managing temperature differences across multiple zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a standard ramp rate is used to increase temperature to the setpoint, then the temperature control is simple, but the manufacturing time is lost and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing productivityVSAvoidnon-productive manufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic ramp rate that adjusts based on real-time current measurements. The system transitions from a fixed standard ramp rate to a variable ramp rate that adapts to changing thermal conditions, allowing faster heating when safe and slower heating when approaching current limits, thereby reducing total heating time while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the ramp rate parameter dynamically during the heating process. By monitoring electric current and adjusting the ramp rate accordingly (increasing or decreasing based on current relative to maximum limits), the system optimizes heating speed while preventing overheating, thus improving productivity without sacrificing safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a higher ramp rate is used to reduce heating time, then productivity improves, but the risk of overheating and thermal stress increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing productivityVSAvoidthermal stress and overheating risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors electric current flowing through the heating element and uses this feedback to adjust the ramp rate in real-time. When current approaches the maximum limit, the ramp rate is reduced to prevent overheating; when current is well below the limit, the ramp rate can be increased to improve productivity. This closed-loop feedback mechanism resolves the contradiction between speed and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a current limit band (e.g., 80-100% of maximum current) before reaching the absolute maximum, allowing proactive adjustment of the ramp rate. By cushioning against the maximum current limit in advance rather than reacting after being exceeded, the system prevents thermal stress and overheating while maintaining optimal heating speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Loss of time

If the ramp rate is increased to reach setpoint faster, then non-productive time is reduced, but current limits may be exceeded causing safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating timeVSAvoidsystem safety and reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the ramp rate based on real-time current conditions rather than using a fixed rate. This allows the system to safely maximize heating speed by increasing ramp rate when current is low and reducing it when current approaches limits, thereby minimizing heating time while maintaining system reliability and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for more precise and efficient temperature control, reducing non-productive time and preventing thermal stress across heating zones, thereby enhancing manufacturing productivity and equipment longevity.

Implementation Method 1

A thermal system generally includes a heater having resistive heating elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12225635B2Method and system for providing variable ramp-up control for an electric heater
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CO
  • US12225635B2 patent drawing
  • US12225635B2 patent drawing
  • US12225635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one form, the present disclosure is directed toward a method for controlling temperature of a heater including a resistive heating element. The method includes applying power to the resistive heating element of the heater at a variable ramp rate to increase temperature of the heater to a desired temperature setpoint. The variable ramp rate is set to a desired ramp rate. The method further includes monitoring an electric current flowing through the resistive heating element of the heater, and reducing the variable ramp rate from the desired ramp rate to a permitted ramp rate in response to the electric current being greater than a lower limit of an electric current limit band. An upper limit of the electric current limit band is provided as a system current limit.