Heating cooling system for food storage cabinet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for heating and cooling food for transport and service are inefficient, bulky, costly, and pose health risks due to the use of harmful chemicals and uneven heating, while existing solutions for thermoelectric systems are slow to reach desired temperatures and require multiple components.

Innovation Solution

A portable food transport cabinet using a thermoelectric system with Peltier chips, manifold blocks, and radiators, powered by a battery, which allows for efficient heating and cooling with a simple control system, utilizing a single-type temperature adjusting element and non-toxic heat transfer fluids, and can be adapted for use with existing food service equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional refrigeration systems are used for cooling food, then cooling capability is provided, but the systems are bulky, costly, and require harmful chemicals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capabilityVSAvoidsystem bulk and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical refrigeration systems with thermoelectric cooling elements that use electrical current to create temperature differentials through the Peltier effect, eliminating the need for compressors, condensers, and harmful refrigerant chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental operating parameter from mechanical compression to electrical-driven thermoelectric effect, allowing for a compact, maintenance-free cooling system that achieves the same thermal management function without the bulk and complexity of traditional systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If flame-based heating systems are used for heating food, then heating capability is provided, but local hot spots and uneven heating occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating capabilityVSAvoidheating uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the heating function into multiple independent heating zones with separate heating elements, allowing each zone to be independently controlled to achieve uniform heat distribution across the entire food surface without localized hot spots

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different heating characteristics to different spatial locations within the cabinet, with each heating zone tailored to provide optimal heat distribution for its specific region, ensuring uniform heating throughout

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If flame-based heating systems are used for heating food, then heating capability is provided, but fumes and combustion products are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating capabilityVSAvoidcombustion byproducts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces combustion-based heating with electrical heating elements that generate heat through resistive heating, completely eliminating the production of fumes, odors, and other combustion byproducts while maintaining effective heating capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful combustion process into a clean electrical heating process, where the same heating function is achieved without the harmful side effects, turning a potentially dangerous system into a safe one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Device complexity

If thermoelectric systems are used for heating and cooling, then compactness is achieved, but the systems take a long time to reach desired temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compactnessVSAvoidtemperature reach time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the thermoelectric system into multiple independent modules that can operate simultaneously, increasing the total heat transfer capacity and reducing the time required to reach desired temperatures while maintaining the compact form factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the thermoelectric elements to function in both heating and cooling modes, allowing the same compact components to provide rapid temperature adjustment in either direction by simply reversing the electrical current direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Adaptability or versatility

If multiple temperature adjusting elements are used, then heating and cooling functions are provided, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs thermoelectric elements that can operate in both heating and cooling modes, allowing a single type of component to provide both temperature adjustment functions by simply reversing the electrical current direction, thereby simplifying the control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the reversible nature of the thermoelectric effect, where reversing the electrical current direction switches the element between heating and cooling modes, eliminating the need for separate heating and cooling components and simplifying the overall control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system rapidly reaches and maintains desired temperatures for food safety, improving efficiency and safety by using a compact, portable, and cost-effective solution that reduces health risks associated with traditional heating methods.

Implementation Method 1

A portable food transport cabinet using a thermoelectric system with Peltier chips

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPeltier effect: Peltier Effect

Implementation Method 2

manifold blocks, and radiators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

manifold blocks, and radiators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3094929B1Heating cooling system for food storage cabinet
Publication Date: 2021.08.11 BI POLAR HLDG COMPANY
  • EP3094929B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3094929B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3094929B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems for heating or cooling a food service container to an appropriate temperature for service or transport, and cabinets including such systems. A first manifold allows a seal to be made against a first surface of one or more Peltier chips and defines a flow path for a heat transfer fluid which directly contacts the first surfaces of the Peltier chips. The fluid circulates through tubing from the first manifold to a first radiator. A second opposite manifold defines a flow path for a heat transfer fluid which directly contacts the second surfaces of the Peltier chips. The fluid then circulates through tubing from the second manifold to a second radiator. The first radiator may be disposed inside, and the second radiator outside, the cabinet. Application of current in a first direction to the Peltier chips can heat the cabinet and reversal of the current may cool the cabinet.