Heavy Ion Microbeam Interlacing for Targeted Radiation Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional radiation therapy faces limitations due to radiation damage to normal tissues and the inability to effectively treat small tumors or neurological targets without damaging surrounding tissues, and heavy ion therapy has challenges with beam broadening and valley dose issues.

Innovation Solution

Implementing interlaced heavy ion microbeams, where two arrays of parallel microbeams are interleaved to create a broad radiation field only within the target volume, utilizing the inherent beam broadening characteristics of heavy ions to minimize damage to normal tissues and enhance therapeutic dose delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional radiation therapy is used to treat tumors, then therapeutic dose can be delivered to target, but radiation damage occurs to normal tissues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic dose deliveryVSAvoidradiation damage to normal tissues
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the radiation field into discrete microbeams separated by unirradiated gaps. Two arrays of microbeams are interlaced to deliver therapy while normal tissues in the gaps receive minimal radiation, thus segmenting the dose distribution to spare healthy tissues while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness in the target volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating non-uniform radiation distribution where different regions receive different doses. The target volume receives high therapeutic dose through interlaced microbeam arrays, while normal tissues in the gap regions receive minimal or zero dose, achieving localized high-dose delivery with spatially varying radiation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If beam thickness is reduced to spare normal tissues, then normal tissue tolerance increases, but beam broadening occurs in heavy ion therapy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenormal tissue damageVSAvoidbeam broadening
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by accounting for and compensating for beam broadening effects before treatment delivery. The microbeam array geometry and spacing are pre-calculated to account for expected beam broadening, ensuring that despite the broadening, the microbeams still maintain sufficient separation to spare normal tissues while covering the target volume effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by exploiting the energy-dependent broadening characteristics of heavy ions. By optimizing beam energy and microbeam spacing parameters, the system achieves acceptable broadening control that allows normal tissue sparing while maintaining effective target coverage, adjusting parameters to balance these competing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If heavy ion beams are used to increase therapeutic effectiveness, then RBE increases, but valley dose issues arise between microbeams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelative biological effectivenessVSAvoidvalley dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potentially harmful valley dose effect into a beneficial feature by strategically positioning normal tissues in the gap regions between microbeams. The valley regions, which would normally be considered harmful due to scattered radiation, become protective zones where normal tissues receive minimal dose while still benefiting from the high RBE therapeutic effect in the interlaced target regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively delivers a therapeutic dose to the target while sparing normal tissues, allowing for the treatment of small and large tumors with reduced radiation leakage and valley dose, and can be administered from multiple directions to reduce the necessary entrance dose.

Implementation Method 1

therapeutic microbeam arrays of protons and heavy ions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon Beam: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 2

utilizing the inherent beam broadening characteristics of heavy ions to minimize damage to normal tissues

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam broadening:

Data Source

PatentUS8269198B2Heavy ion therapy with microbeams
Publication Date: 2012.09.18 THE RES FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK
  • US8269198B2 patent drawing
  • US8269198B2 patent drawing
  • US8269198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for delivering therapeutic heavy ion radiation to a subject, wherein a therapeutic dose of heavy ions is delivered substantially only to a target volume within the subject by generating a broad field of radiation effect substantially only within the target volume, and wherein the broad field of radiation effect is not generated in non-targeted tissue. The method includes the step of irradiating the target volume with at least two arrays of heavy ion microbeams, wherein the at least two arrays each have at least two parallel, spatially distinct heavy ion microbeams. The two arrays of microbeams are interleaved substantially only within the target volume to form a substantially continuous broad beam of radiation substantially only within the target volume.