Heavy Machine Workflow Adjustment for Accident Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanisms are inadequate for effectively addressing a wide range of accidental scenarios in heavy machinery operations, requiring immediate detection and dynamic allocation of resources to mitigate potential accidents while maintaining operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using trained artificial intelligence models to detect or predict accidental scenarios and dynamically adjust workflows by identifying and deploying alternative heavy machines to assist in mitigating these scenarios, ensuring operational efficiency is maintained.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current mechanisms are used to address accidental scenarios, then response time is reduced, but operational efficiency deteriorates due to inadequate resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccidental scenario mitigationVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts workflows and reallocates heavy machines based on real-time accident detection and severity assessment. The workflow adjuster continuously monitors operational data and modifies task assignments dynamically, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining overall productivity through automated resource optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where operational data from heavy machines is continuously collected, analyzed by the accident detector, and used to generate real-time recommendations. The workflow adjuster receives feedback on accident mitigation effectiveness and continuously optimizes resource allocation to balance safety responses with operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If heavy machines are reallocated to mitigate accidental scenarios, then safety is improved, but operational efficiency deteriorates due to workflow disruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial reallocation of heavy machines based on accident severity. Instead of fully stopping all operations, the workflow adjuster selectively reassigns only the necessary machines to mitigation tasks while maintaining other workflows. This partial action approach ensures safety responses are adequate without causing complete operational shutdowns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically by adjusting workflow priorities and machine allocation based on accident conditions. The workflow adjuster modifies task parameters, timing, and resource distribution to balance safety requirements with continued operational productivity, allowing non-critical operations to continue while safety responses are executed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If AI models are deployed to detect and respond to accidental scenarios, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccidental scenario detectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI-based accident detector and workflow adjuster serve multiple functions: detecting accidents, assessing severity, predicting outcomes, generating recommendations, and dynamically adjusting workflows. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a unified platform, managing complexity while enhancing detection and response capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated AI-driven detection and response mechanisms. The accident detector automatically identifies and assesses accidents without human intervention, and the workflow adjuster autonomously reallocates resources based on AI-generated recommendations. This automation reduces the need for complex manual monitoring and decision-making processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260071406A1Dynamic workflow adjustment to assist heavy machines involved in accidental scenarios
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20260071406A1 patent drawing
  • US20260071406A1 patent drawing
  • US20260071406A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for dynamic workflow adjustments to assist heavy machines involved in accidental scenarios. Real-time data associated with an activity area where a heavy machine is performing an activity is monitored. The monitored data may then be analyzed by a first trained artificial intelligence (AI) model to determine if an accidental scenario is detected or predicted. Upon detecting or predicting an accidental scenario, a knowledge repository including information, such as the capabilities of heavy machines, is analyzed. Based on the analysis of the knowledge repository, a second AI model identifies a heavy machine to mitigate the accidental scenario. Furthermore, the second AI model adjusts the workflow for the heavy machine providing the assistance and/or for the heavy machine engaged in the activity involving the detected or predicted accidental scenario. The identified heavy machine may then be deployed to perform the adjusted workflow to mitigate the accidental scenario.