Heavy Oil Hydroconversion with Slurry Catalyst and Deasphalting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for converting heavy crude oils, bitumen from 'oil sands,' and distillation residues face challenges such as high coke formation and catalyst deactivation in thermal processes, and economic and environmental issues with catalyst recycling in hydrogenation processes, particularly with fixed and ebullated bed technologies.

Innovation Solution

A process utilizing deasphalting, hydroconversion with catalysts in the slurry phase, and distillation or flash units, where the heavy charge is processed in multiple stages with separate hydroprocessing sections and distillation, allowing for efficient conversion and upgrading with reduced coke production and catalyst recycling needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If thermal conversion process is used, then conversion of heavy charges is achieved, but high coke formation and low product quality occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidcoke formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical environment parameters by introducing hydrogen atmosphere and modifying temperature/pressure conditions to transform the thermal conversion process into a hydroconversion process, thereby reducing coke formation while maintaining conversion efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses hydrogen as a reactive gas phase component that chemically interacts with the heavy charge, accelerating the conversion process and preventing coke formation through hydrogenation reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

2Productivity

If fixed bed hydrogenation technology is used, then hydrogenation treatment is achieved, but catalyst deactivation occurs quickly due to contaminants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the heavy charge into lighter fractions through deasphalting before hydroconversion, preventing contaminants from directly contacting and deactivating the catalyst in the fixed bed reactor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary deasphalting and contaminant removal operations before the hydroconversion stage, preparing the charge in advance to protect the catalyst from deactivation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If ebullated bed technology is used, then processing of heavy charges with high contaminants is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst performanceVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the conversion process into separate stages (deasphalting, hydroconversion, distillation) with distinct functions, allowing each unit to be optimized independently rather than requiring a complex integrated ebullated bed system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces deasphalting as an intermediary process that prepares the charge before hydroconversion, simplifying the requirements for the hydroconversion reactor itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If catalyst is used at low concentration, then environmental impact is reduced, but product upgrading is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the catalyst system into multiple stages with different concentration requirements, allowing low catalyst concentration in the main hydroconversion stage while achieving high upgrading through the combined effect of multiple processing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements continuous recycling of the catalyst from distillation residue back to the hydroconversion reactor, maintaining continuous catalytic action that achieves high upgrading efficiency at low steady-state catalyst concentrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Productivity

If catalyst recycling is implemented, then catalyst utilization is improved, but process complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst utilizationVSAvoidrecycle system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the catalyst separation function with the existing distillation operation, where the distillation column simultaneously performs product separation and catalyst concentration, eliminating the need for separate catalyst recovery equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The distillation column performs multiple functions: separating distillate products, concentrating the catalyst in the bottom residue, and facilitating catalyst recycling, thereby simplifying the overall process architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves high conversion and upgrading efficiency with minimal coke production, flexibility in handling different hydrocarbon charges, and the possibility of complete catalyst recycling without regeneration, improving product quality and reducing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

hydroconversion of the charge using a catalyst in the dispersed phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

distillation or flash units

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 3

deasphalting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS7691256B2Process for the conversion of heavy charges such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
Publication Date: 2010.04.06 ENI SPA
  • US7691256B2 patent drawing
  • US7691256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Heavy hydrocarbon charges are converted in a deasphalting section in the presence of solvents and obtaining two streams, one consisting of deasphalted oil and the other one containing asphaltenes, mixing the deasphalted oil stream with a hydrogenation catalyst and passing the thus obtained mixture to a hydroprocessing section containing hydrogen or hydrogen/H2S, mixing the stream consisting of asphaltenes discharged from the deasphalting section with an appropriate hydrogenation catalyst and passing the obtained mixture to a second hydroprocessing section where it is reacted with hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S, passing both the stream containing the reaction product with dispersed catalyst from the hydroprocessing section and the stream containing the reaction product with dispersed catalyst from the second hydroprocessing section, to one or more distillation or flash stages, whereby the more volatile fractions are separated from the distillation residue (tar) or from the liquid discharged from the flash unit, sending the distillation residue (tar) or the liquid discharged from the flash unit, containing the catalyst in the dispersed phase, with a high content of metal sulphides, produced by demetallization of the charge, to a second deasphalting section thereby obtaining deasphalted oil and asphaltenes.