Automated Hedge Effectiveness Testing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated systems lack an efficient method to evaluate the effectiveness of hedge transactions, which is crucial for financial management and compliance with legal and fiduciary requirements, as they often require complex and time-consuming calculations to determine hedge ratios and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

An automated tool that selects a hedge for testing, performs initial tolerance value checks to determine if additional tests are needed, executes a series of test methods including offset, regression analysis, and market data shift tests, and applies a rule set to the results to set a final effectiveness indicator, which can be displayed or stored for user reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional manual methods are used to evaluate hedge effectiveness, then comprehensive analysis can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehedge effectiveness evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical evaluation processes with an automated computer-based system that performs hedge effectiveness testing through electronic data processing, mathematical calculations, and algorithmic analysis of financial instrument data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated self-evaluation of hedge effectiveness by automatically retrieving data, performing calculations, generating test results, and producing reports without requiring manual intervention for each evaluation cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive test methods are applied to ensure accurate hedge effectiveness, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehedge effectiveness determination reliabilityVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the hedge effectiveness evaluation into distinct modular test methods (offset method, regression analysis, market data shift method) that can be independently selected and executed based on specific testing requirements, making the complex process more manageable and systematic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides a universal automated platform that can perform multiple different test methods and evaluation approaches within a single integrated system, allowing flexible selection of appropriate tests while maintaining consistent automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7707084B1System and method for testing hedge effectiveness
Publication Date: 2010.04.27 SAP SE
  • US7707084B1 patent drawing
  • US7707084B1 patent drawing
  • US7707084B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, systems and methods are disclosed to select a hedge from a plurality of hedges, select a first test method from a plurality of test methods, calculate a first indicia of hedge effectiveness using the first test method, store the first indicia of hedge effectiveness, repeat the calculating and the storing for each of the plurality of test methods; and determine a final indicia of hedge effectiveness by applying the stored plurality of indicia to a rule set. In another embodiment, systems and methods are disclosed to further perform an initial test to determine if additional, more complex tests are required. Embodiments disclosed herein may also display the state or meaning of a final effectiveness indicator to a user.