Height-Adjustable Table With Top-Mounted Constant-Force Counterbalance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing height adjustable tables with counterbalance mechanisms either result in a bulky base that reduces leg room or fail to accommodate varying loads, leading to safety hazards and inefficient height adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A height adjustable table with a constant-force counterbalance mechanism integrated into the top assembly, featuring a tension spring coupled to a snail cam pulley by a snail cable, and a synchronized lift mechanism with pulley systems and bands, allowing for load-variable adjustments and minimal effort height changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If counterbalance mechanisms are disposed within table legs or cross-member beams, then height adjustment is effortless, but the support structure becomes bulky and reduces leg room

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight adjustment effortVSAvoidbase volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The counterbalance mechanism is extracted from the traditional locations (table legs and cross-member beams) and relocated to the top assembly. This extraction allows the base structure to become compact and minimizes leg room occupation while maintaining the effortless height adjustment function through the constant-force mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The counterbalance mechanism is repositioned from the vertical dimension (within legs) or horizontal dimension (cross-member beams) to the top assembly dimension. This dimensional relocation resolves the spatial conflict between mechanism volume and leg room requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If gas springs provide preset counterbalance force, then more leg room is provided, but the mechanism cannot accommodate varying loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase volumeVSAvoidload accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The counterbalance mechanism transitions from a static preset force system (gas springs) to a dynamic constant-force system. The constant-force counterbalance mechanism adapts to varying loads by maintaining optimal counterbalance force throughout the adjustment range, enabling effortless operation with different weight configurations on the work surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The counterbalance force parameter is changed from a fixed preset value to a constant force that maintains effectiveness across varying load conditions. This parameter optimization allows the mechanism to accommodate different loads while keeping the base structure compact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If counterbalance force exceeds applied load, then height adjustment is easy, but the work surface moves rapidly creating safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight adjustment effortVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The constant-force counterbalance mechanism incorporates feedback through its mechanical design, where the force exerted by the spring is regulated to match the applied load. This feedback control prevents the work surface from moving too rapidly by maintaining force equilibrium, ensuring safe operation while preserving ease of adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The counterbalance mechanism applies preliminary counterbalancing force that is precisely calibrated to match the applied load before movement occurs. This preliminary anti-action prevents excessive motion by counteracting the load appropriately, eliminating safety hazards while maintaining effortless adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a non-bulky design that accommodates varying loads, ensuring safe and effortless height adjustments while preventing safety risks associated with non-load variable counterbalance tables.

Implementation Method 1

the counterbalance mechanism, which can comprise a tension spring coupled to a snail cam pulley by a snail cable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

coupled to a snail cam pulley by a snail cable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam: Cam

Implementation Method 3

The synchronized lift mechanism can comprise at least two bands operatively engaged with a pulley system disposed within the right and left telescoping leg assemblies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPulley: Pulley

Data Source

PatentUS9038549B1Height adjustable table
Publication Date: 2015.05.26 HUMANSCALE CORP
  • US9038549B1 patent drawing
  • US9038549B1 patent drawing
  • US9038549B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A height adjustable table, which has a constant-force counterbalance mechanism integrated into a top assembly of the table is disclosed. The height adjustable table can include a top assembly supported by a base assembly, which can include right and left telescoping leg assemblies. The top assembly can include a work surface supported by a housing. A counterbalance mechanism, which can include a spring coupled to a snail cam pulley, can be mounted within the housing. A synchronized lift mechanism, which can include at least two bands operatively engaged with a pulley system disposed within the right and left telescoping leg assemblies, can be operatively coupled to the snail cam pulley such that the counterbalance force provided by the counterbalance mechanism is transmitted to the synchronized lift mechanism.