Calibrating Non-Contact Velocity Instruments via Hugoniot Elastic Limit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-contact velocity measurement techniques, such as Laser Shockwave Technique (LST), face challenges in calibration due to the complexity of reproducing stress waves across different measurement systems, leading to inconsistent and equipment-dependent results, which hinders the standardization of surface velocity measurements and the prediction of real-world performance.

Innovation Solution

The method involves inducing a stress wave into a sample to reach its Hugoniot Elastic Limit (HEL), measuring the associated velocity, and using this material property to calibrate non-contact velocity measurement instruments by comparing measured velocities across different systems, ensuring accuracy based on the material's properties rather than the delivery mechanism or energy magnitude.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If non-contact velocity measurement techniques are used to measure surface velocity, then measurement capability is provided, but calibration consistency and reproducibility deteriorate due to equipment-dependent results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalibration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calibration approach from equipment-dependent parameters to material-dependent parameters. Specifically, it uses the Hugoniot Elastic Limit (HEL) velocity - a fundamental material property - as the calibration reference instead of equipment-specific calibration standards. This allows different measurement systems to be calibrated against the same material property, ensuring consistency and reproducibility across equipment while maintaining velocity measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If stress wave delivery mechanisms are used to induce stress, then stress application is achieved, but calibration standardization deteriorates due to complexity in reproducing stress waves across different systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress wave applicationVSAvoidstress wave reproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the calibration reference from the complex stress wave delivery mechanism and isolates it as a fundamental material property (HEL velocity). Instead of trying to reproduce and standardize the complex stress wave delivery across different systems, the method takes out the essential reference point - the material's intrinsic HEL velocity - which can be measured and used for calibration without requiring identical stress wave generation equipment. This reduces device complexity while maintaining stress application capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If equipment-specific calibration methods are used, then calibration is achievable, but adaptability and standardization across different systems deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidcross-system standardization
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using a fundamental material property (HEL velocity) that is independent of measurement equipment or stress wave delivery system. This material-based reference can serve multiple different measurement systems and stress delivery mechanisms universally, enabling standardization across diverse equipment while maintaining calibration accuracy. The HEL velocity acts as a universal calibration standard that any system can reference without being equipment-specific.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the standardization of velocity measurements, improving the accuracy and reproducibility of results across various systems, making it suitable for applications beyond interface strength determination, such as monitoring mechanical properties in diverse materials and systems.

Implementation Method 1

inducing a wave into a sample to stress the sample at or above an elastic limit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

measuring a velocity of the sample as it is stressed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser Doppler Velocimetry: Laser Doppler Velocimetry

Data Source

PatentUS10620100B2Non-contact velocity measurement instruments and systems, and related methods
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE LLC
  • US10620100B2 patent drawing
  • US10620100B2 patent drawing
  • US10620100B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for calibration of non-contact velocity measurements and systems for implementing the same are described. Generally, the method comprises inducing a shock wave into a sample at a stress intensity that varies across the sample's elastic limit, which corresponds to the elastic-plastic state transition of the sample. That transition state may be at the sample's Hugoniot elastic limit. The velocity of the sample is measured using a non-contact velocity measurement instrument such as a velocimeter. The measurement may be compared to a predicted velocity or a velocity measurement made by another system to determine calibration parameters.