Helical Anti-Splay Flanges for Spinal Rod Clamping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional open-headed bone screws with threaded plugs face issues of radial splaying and loosening due to high torques required for secure rod locking, leading to potential failure and increased implant bulk when trying to minimize profile and intrusiveness.

Innovation Solution

The use of helical guide and advancement flanges with anti-splay contours on both inner and outer flanges, featuring radially interlocking lips and grooves, which resist splaying and allow for higher torque application without arm separation, enabling secure rod clamping and reduced profile implants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If conventional threaded plugs are used to close open-headed bone screws, then the implant profile remains low, but radial splaying occurs under high torque leading to loosening and potential failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant profileVSAvoidresistance to splaying and loosening
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-splay lip and groove are pre-configured on the flanges to resist radial splaying forces before they occur. When torque is applied to tighten the rod, the anti-splay lip engages with the anti-splay groove to prevent the arms from splaying outward, thereby preventing loosening and failure while maintaining a low implant profile

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The helical flanges incorporate curved, helical contours that wrap around the rod in a spiral pattern. This curved geometry provides mechanical interlocking that resists both axial displacement and radial splaying, allowing the closure to securely hold the rod while maintaining a compact, low-profile structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Force

If higher torque is applied to secure the rod in the open-headed bone screw, then clamping force increases, but radial outward forces cause splaying of the arms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping force on rodVSAvoidarm separation and loosening
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-splay lip and groove are pre-configured on the flanges to resist radial splaying forces before they occur. When torque is applied to tighten the rod, the anti-splay lip engages with the anti-splay groove to prevent the arms from splaying outward, thereby preventing loosening and failure while maintaining a low implant profile

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The closure integrates multiple functions into a single component: the helical flanges provide both the clamping action on the rod and the anti-splay resistance. The anti-splay lip and groove are combined with the helical advancement mechanism, allowing one component to simultaneously secure the rod against axial movement and prevent radial splaying under torque

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8523913B2Helical guide and advancement flange with break-off extensions
Publication Date: 2013.09.03 JACKSON CORP
  • US8523913B2 patent drawing
  • US8523913B2 patent drawing
  • US8523913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal fixation device combines an open-headed anchor member, such as a bone screw or a hook with spaced apart arms forming a rod receiving channel. The arms have break-off arm extensions that are broken-off or separated after the rod is clamped. The closure and inner surfaces of the arms and tabs have mating helical anti-splay guide and advancement flanges formed thereon which radially interlock and mechanically cooperate to prevent splaying the arms and extensions as the closure is advanced into the rod receiving channel.