Intertwined Helical Birdfeeder Receptacles for High-Density Feeding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Birdfeeders face challenges in attracting a large number of birds in a small spatial footprint, being visually appealing, while also being easy to use and discouraging squirrels from accessing the feed.

Innovation Solution

The design includes multiple feed chambers with a helical or spiral feed flow path, multiple feed ports at different heights, and a squirrel shield assembly to prevent squirrel access, allowing for convenient filling and refilling without compromising bird access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple feed ports are provided to attract a large number of birds, then the bird diversity and feeding capacity are improved, but the device complexity and difficulty of filling/refilling increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding capacityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The birdfeeder is divided into multiple independent feed chambers (first feed chamber, second feed chamber, etc.), each with its own feed ports. This segmentation allows multiple birds to feed simultaneously in different chambers, increasing feeding capacity while keeping each individual chamber simple in structure and easy to fill independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes vertical stacking of feed chambers one above another, transitioning from a horizontal arrangement to a vertical three-dimensional configuration. This allows multiple feed ports to be provided without increasing the horizontal footprint, and each chamber can be filled through its own fill port at the top, maintaining ease of operation while increasing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If multiple feed chambers are stacked vertically to save space, then the spatial footprint is reduced, but the ease of access for filling becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial footprintVSAvoidease of filling
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each feed chamber is equipped with its own fill port at the top, allowing independent filling of each chamber. This segmentation means that even though chambers are stacked vertically, each can be accessed and filled separately without requiring access to other chambers, maintaining ease of operation despite vertical stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fill ports are positioned at the top of each chamber, allowing feed to be added in advance and distributed downward through the chambers. This preliminary action of filling at the top enables the vertical stacking configuration to work efficiently, as feed is introduced at the highest point and naturally distributes to lower chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If feed ports are made accessible to birds, then bird access is improved, but squirrel access and nuisance animal problems worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebird accessVSAvoidsquirrel access
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the birdfeeder have different functional qualities: the feed chambers and feed ports are designed with bird-friendly features (open access, appropriate port sizes), while the exterior surfaces and support structures are designed with squirrel-resistant features (smooth surfaces, no perching areas, protective shields). This local differentiation allows bird access to be maintained while preventing squirrel access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potential harm of squirrel access into a benefit by designing protective shields and smooth surfaces that not only prevent squirrel access but also create a cleaner, more maintainable structure. The same smooth surfaces that prevent squirrel perching also make the feeder easier to clean and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively attracts a large number of birds in a small space, is visually appealing, and prevents squirrel access, reducing waste and damage while maintaining ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

such that the feed can be added at the fill port and then flow to the feed ports, e.g., under the influence of gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11284605B1Birdfeeders with multiple feeding ports
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 PANACEA PRODUCTS CORP
  • US11284605B1 patent drawing
  • US11284605B1 patent drawing
  • US11284605B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various birdfeeder designs are provided for flowable bird feed such as seeds or nectar. In one design, the birdfeeder (100) has a housing including first and second receptacles (102 and 104). The receptacles (102 and 104) are intertwined to form a double helical configuration. A large number of feed ports (106) can be distributed across the receptacles (102 and 104) to attract a large number of birds in a small area. Partitions (116) within the receptacles (102 and 104) define a number of feed chambers (118) to supply feed at the feed ports (106).