Helical Cutting Edge Layout for Low-Mark Machining Tools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machining tools leave visible machining marks on workpieces due to the angular spacing of cutting edges, which necessitate multiple cutting lines, leading to overlapping regions that form visible teeth and generate vibrations and noise.

Innovation Solution

A machining tool design where cutting edges of multiple cutting bodies overlap in a gapless manner perpendicular to the direction of rotation, forming an overall cutting edge on an imaginary helix line, minimizing the number of visible teeth and optimizing the distribution of cutting edges to reduce vibrations and noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If cutting edges are arranged with angular spacing to allow isolated eroding or grinding, then ease of maintenance is improved, but machining marks and visible teeth on workpiece are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolated eroding or grinding of cutting edgesVSAvoidmachining marks on workpiece
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional angular spacing in the rotational plane to a helical arrangement that extends into the axial dimension. Cutting edges are positioned along a helix line with specific pitch and angle, creating a three-dimensional distribution that eliminates angular spacing gaps while maintaining accessibility for maintenance. This dimensional extension allows cutting edges to overlap in the radial direction without requiring angular separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting edge arrangement is segmented into multiple discrete cutting edges positioned at specific intervals along the helix line. Each cutting edge can be independently maintained while the overall helical pattern ensures continuous coverage. The segmentation allows for isolated maintenance of individual cutting edges while the helical geometry prevents visible marks on the workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multiple cutting lines are arranged one behind the other to cover the workpiece, then productivity is improved, but overlapping regions create visible teeth and increase device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece coverageVSAvoidnumber of cutting lines
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple discrete cutting lines into a single continuous helical cutting line. Instead of arranging separate cutting lines one behind the other, all cutting edges are positioned along a single helix line that winds around the tool axis. This merging eliminates overlapping regions between cutting lines while maintaining comprehensive workpiece coverage, thereby reducing visible teeth and simplifying the device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting edges are arranged along a helical curve rather than straight radial lines. This curvature allows the cutting edges to distribute their engagement points continuously around the workpiece surface, achieving complete coverage without requiring multiple discrete cutting lines. The helical path naturally eliminates overlapping regions that would create visible teeth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Manufacturing precision

If cutting edges overlap in the direction perpendicular to rotation to form continuous cutting line, then manufacturing precision is improved, but vibrations and noise increase due to multiple teeth engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous cutting lineVSAvoidvibrations and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The helical arrangement creates a periodic engagement pattern where cutting edges contact the workpiece at regular intervals along the helix. This periodic action distributes the cutting forces more evenly over time compared to simultaneous engagement of multiple teeth, reducing vibration amplitude and noise. The pitch of the helix determines the period of engagement, allowing optimization of the periodic action to minimize harmful vibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12485568B2Machining tool
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 LEDERMANN GMBH & CO KG
  • US12485568B2 patent drawing
  • US12485568B2 patent drawing
  • US12485568B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machining tool has a main body with a carrier surface. Cutting bodies each having a cutting edge are arranged on the carrier surface, the edges rotating in a direction of rotation which runs around an axis of rotation during the machining. The edges of a group including a plurality of cutting bodies overlap in a gapless manner with respect to the direction perpendicular to the direction of rotation and form an overall edge. All of the edges are arranged between end points of the overall edge. The group has a minimum number of teeth defined by the number of edges at least situated one behind the other in the direction of rotation in an intermediate region of the overall edge. The edges of the group overlap with respect to the direction perpendicular to the direction of rotation such that the minimum number of teeth is at least two.