Helical Flow Control Insert for Fuel Cell Coolant Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy dissipation devices in fuel cell stack assemblies are costly, complex, and difficult to manufacture, and they do not ensure consistent delivery of coolant to individual cooling plates, leading to inconsistent thermal energy removal.

Innovation Solution

The use of a conduit with a flow control insert that redirects fuel cell fluid to flow helically, creating a pressure drop and ensuring consistent delivery to cooling plates, thereby simplifying the structure and manufacturing process while maintaining a large flow opening to prevent plugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional energy dissipation devices are used to control coolant flow, then flow control is achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control consistencyVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The energy dissipation device is segmented into a conduit portion and a separate flow control insert. The insert can be removed, replaced, or adjusted independently from the conduit, allowing for simplified manufacturing and assembly while maintaining reliable flow control through the insert's helical wire structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow control insert is designed as a simple, inexpensive component made from coiled wire that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. This disposable-like approach to the insert reduces overall device complexity and manufacturing cost while maintaining flow control reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If complex energy dissipation devices are used, then flow control is achieved, but manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant delivery consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the flow control insert from the conduit, each component can be manufactured independently using simple processes. The insert can be made by coiling wire, and the conduit can be manufactured separately, then assembled together, greatly easing manufacturing compared to creating a single complex integrated device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert is designed as a simple, easily manufactured component that does not require complex machining or assembly. Its simplicity makes it easy to produce in quantity at low cost, resolving the contradiction between reliable flow control and manufacturing ease

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Manufacturing precision

If small flow openings are used in energy dissipation devices, then flow control precision is improved, but plugging risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidplugging resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The helical wire structure of the insert creates a curved, spiral flow path for the coolant rather than a straight or sharply restricted path. This curved geometry provides flow control precision while maintaining a large effective flow opening that resists plugging, as the helical structure does not create narrow constrictions where debris could accumulate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a consistent and efficient delivery of fuel cell fluid to each cooling plate, ensuring uniform thermal energy removal and reducing manufacturing complexity and costs.

Implementation Method 1

The flow control insert is configured to cause a fuel cell fluid to flow helically relative to the longitudinal direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical flow:

Implementation Method 2

The energy dissipation devices are often costly, complex, and difficult to manufacture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS9425470B2Energy dissipation device for controlling flow of a fuel cell fluid
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 CLEAREDGE POWER CORP
  • US9425470B2 patent drawing
  • US9425470B2 patent drawing
  • US9425470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example energy dissipation device for controlling a fuel cell fluid includes a conduit extending in longitudinal direction between a first opening and a second opening. A flow control insert is configured to be received within the conduit. The flow control insert is configured to cause a fuel cell fluid to flow helically relative to the longitudinal direction.