Helical Flow Diverters for Flexible Conduit Backpressure Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flexible fluid flow conduits experience increased frictional losses and backpressure due to bends, which reduce flow velocity and increase head loss, making it necessary to develop a device that mitigates these adverse flow considerations.

Innovation Solution

A fluid flow modifying device comprising a tubular body and helical flow diverters made from resilient polymeric materials, which are attached to the inner surface and extend outwardly, creating a rotational flow profile that reduces frictional losses and enhances flow velocity by converting laminar flow to rotational flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If bends are introduced in flexible fluid flow conduits to facilitate routing, then adaptability and routing flexibility are improved, but frictional losses and backpressure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting flexibilityVSAvoidfrictional losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The conduit is divided into multiple curved segments rather than a single bend, allowing the flow to gradually change direction through a series of smaller curvature transitions. This segmentation reduces the intensity of frictional losses at each segment while maintaining overall routing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces flow modifiers with curved surfaces that create a more uniform flow distribution across the conduit cross-section. The curved geometry of the flow modifiers reduces flow separation and turbulence at bends, thereby reducing frictional losses while preserving the ability to route fluid through curved paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Adaptability or versatility

If bends are introduced in flexible fluid flow conduits, then routing flexibility is improved, but backpressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting flexibilityVSAvoidbackpressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the bend into multiple smaller curved segments, the pressure gradient across each segment is reduced. This prevents excessive backpressure buildup that would occur in a single sharp bend, while still achieving the desired routing change through the cumulative effect of multiple segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow modifiers introduce curved surfaces that promote smoother flow transitions through bends. This reduces flow separation and turbulence, thereby minimizing the pressure loss and backpressure increase that typically accompany bent conduit configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Device complexity

If conventional straight flowing is used in fluid flow conduits, then device complexity is minimized, but flow velocity decreases due to laminar flow effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconduit simplicityVSAvoidflow velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces curved flow modifiers within the conduit that create a more uniform velocity profile across the flow cross-section. The curved surfaces of these modifiers reduce the parabolic velocity distribution characteristic of laminar flow, thereby increasing the average flow velocity without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Stability of the object's composition

If laminar flow occurs in fluid flow conduits, then flow stability is maintained, but frictional losses increase and head loss occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow stabilityVSAvoidhead loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The curved flow modifiers redistribute the flow velocity profile to reduce the velocity gradient near the conduit walls. This reduces the shear stress and frictional losses associated with laminar flow, thereby decreasing head loss while maintaining flow stability through the smooth curved surfaces that prevent turbulence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device increases the average flow velocity and volumetric flow rate while reducing backpressure, promoting a more efficient and effective fluid flow through conduits with bends by minimizing frictional interactions with the conduit surface.

Implementation Method 1

Laminar flow results from frictional between the interior surface of a fluid flow conduit and a generally straight flowing fluid. As shown in FIG. 1, conventional (i.e., non-modified/straight flowing) flow of liquid 5 (i.e., a flowable material) within a flow passage 10 of a fluid flow conduit 15 has a flow profile characterized by laminar flow effect (i.e., laminar flow 20).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 2

Bends inherently require flowing fluid to change direction which amplifies fluid interaction with the interior surface of the fluid flow conduit. This amplified interaction correspondingly increases frictional losses between the flowing fluid and the interior surface of the fluid flow conduit.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11619247B1Flexible fluid flow modifying device
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 VORTEX PIPE SYSTEMS LLC
  • US11619247B1 patent drawing
  • US11619247B1 patent drawing
  • US11619247B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed fluid flow modifying devices are useful with flexible fluid flow conduits. Such devices are adapted for mitigating adverse flow considerations arising from one or more bends in flexible fluid flow conduits. These adverse flow considerations are generally characterized as enhanced laminar flow and associated increased backpressure arising from reduced flow velocity caused by the one or more bends. Beneficially, disclosed fluid flow modifying devices cause flow of flowable material (e.g., a liquid) within a flow passage of a fluid flow conduit to have a rotational flow profile. Such a rotational flow profile advantageously reduces frictional losses associated with laminar flow and with directional change of fluid flow.