Helical Flow Reactor Heat Exchanger for High-Pressure Thermal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat exchangers face limitations such as large thermal stresses and restricted temperature differences, which restrict their efficiency and operational flexibility, particularly in handling high-pressure and high-temperature reactions.

Innovation Solution

A reactor design featuring a first outer tube containing a working fluid and a first inner tube with a second inner tube wound helically around it, allowing for efficient heat transfer and reaction facilitation, enabling high-pressure reactions without the need for specialized reactors and accommodating a wide range of reactants and conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional heat exchangers are used, then heat transfer function is provided, but large thermal stresses occur and temperature difference is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature differenceVSAvoidthermal stresses
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple functional segments: a first tube for working fluid flow, a second tube for reactant flow, and a helical third tube for heat transfer. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling larger temperature differences without excessive thermal stress in any single location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The third tube is wound helically around the first tube, adding a spatial dimension to the heat transfer arrangement. This helical configuration increases the heat transfer surface area and allows for more effective heat exchange while distributing thermal stresses across a three-dimensional structure rather than concentrating them in a single plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional heat exchangers are used, then heat transfer is achieved, but operational flexibility is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidreactor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor design integrates multiple functions into a single system: the first tube serves as both a structural component and a heat transfer medium conduit, the second tube handles reactant flow and product extraction, and the helical third tube provides both structural support and enhanced heat transfer. This multi-functionality enables the reactor to handle various reactants and conditions while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If high-pressure reactions are conducted, then reaction efficiency is improved, but reactor durability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction efficiencyVSAvoidreactor durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The third tube is nested within the space between the first and second tubes, creating a compact multi-layer structure. This nested arrangement allows the reactor to withstand high pressures by distributing the pressure load across multiple concentric structures, while the helical configuration of the third tube provides additional structural strength without compromising durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances reaction efficiency and flexibility by allowing high-pressure operations, handling multiple reactants under varying conditions, and reducing the need for expensive, fragile glass-lined metal reactors, while maintaining operational simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

Heat transfer in such a heat exchanger usually involves convection in each fluid and thermal conduction through the wall separating the two fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

Heat transfer in such a heat exchanger usually involves convection in each fluid and thermal conduction through the wall separating the two fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

Heat transfer in such a heat exchanger usually involves convection in each fluid and thermal conduction through the wall separating the two fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

Heat transfer in such a heat exchanger usually involves convection in each fluid and thermal conduction through the wall separating the two fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS20220055008A1Flow-type reactor heat-exchanger and methods of manufacture thereof
Publication Date: 2022.02.24 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US20220055008A1 patent drawing
  • US20220055008A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A reactor includes a first outer tube configured to contain a working fluid, and a first inner tube disposed in the first outer tube. The first inner tube is configured to contain a source of heat to transfer or absorb heat to or from the working fluid. The reactor further includes a second inner tube in the first outer tube. The second inner tube is wound around the first inner tube in a helical fashion, and the second inner tube is configured absorbs heat from and/or dissipates heat to the working fluid, and/or facilitate a reaction in a reactant contained in the second inner tube.