Intervertebral Disc with Helical Shock Absorber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing prosthetic intervertebral discs lack a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component, which is essential for mimicking the natural disc's motion and stability, leading to inadequate support and motion range in artificial disc replacements.

Innovation Solution

An artificial disc with a mobile core peripherally constrained by a helical shock absorber, providing both articulation and shock-absorbing qualities, allowing for controlled range of motion in axial rotation and maintaining proper intervertebral spacing and full range of motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If only an articulating component is provided between prosthetic endplates, then the device structure is simpler, but shock-absorbing capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidshock-absorbing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the articulating component and shock-absorbing component into a single integrated motion disc device. The articulating component with curved surfaces provides motion functionality, while the shock-absorbing component (elastomeric material) is incorporated within the same device structure to provide shock absorption. This merging resolves the contradiction by achieving both motion capability and shock-absorbing capability without requiring separate independent devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The motion disc is designed as a multi-functional component that simultaneously performs articulation (pivotal motion) and shock absorption. The articulating component with convex and concave curved surfaces enables pivotal motion between vertebrae, while the elastomeric shock-absorbing component within the same device provides shock absorption during compression. This universal design allows a single device to fulfill multiple functions that would otherwise require separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a shock-absorbing component is added to the articulating component, then shock-absorbing capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock-absorbing capabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shock-absorbing component made of elastomeric material is nested within the structure of the motion disc, specifically positioned between the articulating component and the prosthetic endplates. This nesting arrangement allows the shock-absorbing functionality to be incorporated without adding significant external complexity to the device structure, as the shock-absorbing element is integrated into the existing device architecture rather than being a separate external component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If a rubber core is used for shock absorption, then shock-absorbing effect is achieved, but shear stress resistance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock-absorbing effectVSAvoidshear stress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The motion disc employs composite material construction, combining metal or rigid material for the articulating component with elastomeric material for the shock-absorbing component. The articulating component provides structural strength and rigidity necessary for withstanding shear stresses during articulation, while the elastomeric shock-absorbing component provides shock absorption during compression. This composite approach allows each material to perform its optimal function, resolving the contradiction between shock-absorbing effect and shear stress resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The helical shock-absorbing component enhances the disc's stiffness and shock-absorbing qualities, mimicking natural disc behavior in flexion and torsion, providing controlled motion and stability, thus improving the artificial disc's performance in mimicking natural spinal motion.

Implementation Method 1

a shock-absorbing component made of an elastomeric material... providing controlled motion and stability... mimicking natural disc behavior in flexion and torsion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

peripheral, helical shock-absorbing component... providing both articulation and shock-absorbing qualities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS8298287B2Intervertebral motion disc with helical shock absorber
Publication Date: 2012.10.30 DEPUY SPINE INC
  • US8298287B2 patent drawing
  • US8298287B2 patent drawing
  • US8298287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to an intervertebral motion disc having two opposing endplates, a central articulating core, and a peripheral helical shock absorber.