Helical Tissue Sampling Instrument with Variable Radius Zone

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tissue sampling instruments struggle to effectively extract samples from tissues with unifrontal and bifrontal fibers due to insufficient cutting force, fiber accumulation impeding the cutting movement, and potential tissue damage from tapered designs.

Innovation Solution

A tissue receiving element with a spiral or helix structure that has a zone with a smaller distance from the outer surface to the central axis, extending over at least one winding, providing space for fibers and preventing tissue damage, allowing for effective sample extraction without compromising cutting efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the spiral or helical tissue receiving element is made with uniform thickness throughout its length, then the structural strength is maintained, but the cannula cannot cut through fibers effectively and fibers accumulate in the limited space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tissue receiving element has different thicknesses at different locations: thicker at the proximal end for structural strength and thinner at the distal end for easier fiber passage and cutting, allowing each part to have the quality needed for its specific function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the distal end of the spiral is narrowed to enable easier penetration into tissue, then insertion is facilitated, but the tissue sample becomes damaged and cannot be taken undamaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion easeVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spiral has a tapered distal end section with smaller radius for easier tissue penetration, while the proximal section maintains larger radius to preserve structural integrity and provide space for undamaged sample collection, allowing different regions to have different geometric properties suited to their specific operational requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Force

If the spiral tissue receiving element exerts strong pulling force to tear off bifrontal fibers, then sample extraction is improved, but the cannula movement is impeded by accumulated fibers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepulling forceVSAvoidcannula movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spiral geometry provides a third spatial dimension (radial space between windings) for fiber accumulation, allowing fibers to be pushed radially outward during cutting rather than blocking the linear path of the cannula, thus maintaining cutting efficiency while enabling strong pulling force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2623036B1Instrument for taking a tissue sample
Publication Date: 2015.09.16 JANSSENS JACQUES PHILLIBERT
  • EP2623036B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2623036B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2623036B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Instrument (1) for taking a tissue sample, that comprises a tissue receiving element (3) with a distal end (7) and a proximal end (8) and at least partly consists of a spiral or helix that has an outer surface (11) and which has a central longitudinal axis (X-X'), characterised in that the spiral or helix has at least has one zone where the distance (dd) from the outer surface (11) to the central longitudinal axis (X-X') is smaller than at a more proximally located part of the spiral or helix.