Helical Venous Clot Retrieval for Chronic Fibrin Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current therapies for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are inefficient in removing chronic fibrin and often cause vessel trauma, re-stenosis, and require prolonged hospital stays, with existing devices being complex, costly, and ineffective against chronic scar tissue.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a core member, an inner member, and a helical outer member with a flexible material extending between them, configured to engage and remove clots via a low-profile delivery and expanded deployment, allowing for continuous hemostasis and minimal vessel trauma.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If thrombolytics are introduced to disintegrate the clot, then clot removal is achieved, but treatment time is prolonged and hemorrhaging risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclot removal effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical thrombolytic systems with a mechanical thrombectomy device that physically removes clots through a helical screw mechanism. This mechanical approach eliminates the prolonged treatment time and hemorrhaging risks associated with thrombolytics while achieving effective clot removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The device extracts the clot from the vessel lumen as a discrete entity rather than dissolving it in place. The helical outer member engages the clot and mechanically pulls it out through the core member, achieving rapid removal without the time-consuming dissolution process of thrombolytics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If conventional catheter-based thrombectomy devices are used, then clot removal is achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclot removal capabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into simple functional segments: a core member for delivery and retrieval, and a helical outer member for clot engagement. This segmentation creates a less complex device compared to conventional catheter-based systems while maintaining effective clot removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The helical outer member is designed as a flexible component that can be compressed for delivery and expanded for clot engagement. This flexibility simplifies the device structure compared to rigid conventional systems while enabling effective clot capture and removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Productivity

If mechanical clot destruction is performed, then clot removal is achieved, but vessel trauma and re-stenosis risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclot removal efficiencyVSAvoidvessel trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device extracts the clot intact from the vessel rather than destroying it mechanically. The helical outer member engages and pulls the clot out through the core member, avoiding the vessel trauma associated with mechanical destruction methods while maintaining high removal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible material extending between the inner and outer members acts as an intermediary that engages the clot gently without direct mechanical destruction. This mediator allows clot removal while minimizing contact stress on the vessel wall, reducing trauma and re-stenosis risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If highly complex thrombectomy devices are used, then clot removal capability is improved, but ease of operation and navigation difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclot removal effectivenessVSAvoiddevice navigation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The helical outer member is nested within the core member in a compressed configuration for easy delivery and navigation. Upon deployment, the outer member expands to engage the clot. This nesting principle simplifies navigation through the vasculature while maintaining effective clot removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The device transitions dynamically from a compressed low-profile configuration during navigation to an expanded configuration during clot engagement. This dynamic transformation improves ease of navigation while maintaining clot removal effectiveness, eliminating the need for complex navigation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250345081A1Mechanical venous clot retrieval
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 THE FOUNDRY LLC
  • US20250345081A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345081A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345081A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for removal of clot material from a treatment site in a blood vessel, particularly in venous vasculature. A treatment device can include a core member having a distal portion and an inner coil surrounding the distal portion of the core member. A helical outer member surrounds at least a portion of the inner coil, and a sheet of flexible material extends between the inner coil and the helical outer member, such that the sheet extends helically around the inner coil to provide a surface for clot engagement at the treatment site.