Helicopter Airspeed Blending for Accurate Low-Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing airspeed measurement systems for rotary-wing aircraft, such as pitot probes, are not accurate at low airspeeds due to factors like rotor downwash, high angles of attack, and poor signal-to-noise ratio in pressure measurements.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that blend airspeed data from airspeed probes with aircraft state information, using fade values to determine a blended airspeed that is more accurate at low airspeeds by weighting the measured and estimated airspeeds based on their confidence levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pitot probes are used to measure airspeed, then airspeed measurement is achieved at normal speeds, but measurement precision deteriorates at low airspeeds due to rotor downwash, high angles of attack, and poor signal-to-noise ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairspeed measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement reliability across different speed ranges
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple airspeed estimation methods (pitot probe measurements, flight model-based estimates, and sensor fusion techniques) into a single blended airspeed calculation. This merging allows the system to leverage the strengths of each method while compensating for their individual weaknesses, particularly improving low-speed measurement precision by blending pitot data with model-based estimates when pitot signals become unreliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the weighting parameters of different airspeed estimation methods based on flight conditions. At low airspeeds, the blend ratio shifts to rely more on flight model estimates and less on pitot probe data, while at higher speeds, it transitions to relying more on direct pitot measurements. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by optimizing measurement precision for each speed regime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a single airspeed measurement method is used, then system complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates at low airspeeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow airspeed measurement precisionVSAvoidairspeed measurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The airspeed measurement system implements dynamic switching and blending of multiple estimation methods based on real-time flight conditions. The system continuously monitors airspeed ranges and automatically adjusts the blend ratio between different measurement methods, creating a dynamic measurement system that adapts to low-speed and high-speed regimes without requiring manual intervention or complex hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flight control computer is designed to perform multiple functions: it processes pitot probe data, executes flight models, fuses sensor information, and dynamically blends airspeed estimates. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to achieve high measurement precision across all speed ranges without requiring separate dedicated systems for different airspeed regimes, thereby managing complexity while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If airspeed probe data is used alone, then measurement simplicity is maintained, but handling qualities and control efficiency deteriorate at low airspeeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol responsiveness at low airspeedsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring the reliability of pitot probe data and dynamically adjusting the blend ratio of airspeed estimation methods. When low airspeed conditions are detected, the system automatically increases reliance on flight model estimates, providing timely feedback to the control system about actual airspeed. This feedback mechanism improves handling qualities and control responsiveness without requiring complex manual adjustments or pilot training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The blended airspeed approach provides a more accurate calculation of airspeed at low speeds, improving the handling qualities, performance, stability, and efficiency of rotary-wing aircraft, while also enhancing health and usage monitoring of aircraft components.

Implementation Method 1

A method and system blend airspeed data from airspeed probes with aircraft state information, using fade values to determine a blended airspeed that is more accurate at low airspeeds by weighting the measured and estimated airspeeds based on their confidence levels.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal blending with confidence weighting:

Data Source

PatentEP4303687B1Blended airspeed technique for helicopter control at low airspeeds
Publication Date: 2025.02.19 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • EP4303687B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4303687B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4303687B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for controlling a rotary wing aircraft includes determining a measured airspeed of the rotary wing aircraft based on data from a pitot probe, determining an estimated airspeed of the rotary wing aircraft based on rotor control commands, and determining a blended airspeed based on both the measured airspeed and the estimated airspeed.