Helicopter Tug with Reverse-Synchronized Rollers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current helicopter tugs are limited by manual operation of loading and unloading functions, inability to make tight turns or rotate in place, and lack of versatility to accommodate a wide range of helicopter skid sizes.

Innovation Solution

A helicopter tug apparatus with automated operation, featuring reverse synchronized tug rollers to prevent lateral force on the skid, adjustable separation bars for varying skid widths, and a roller engagement clutch for remote-controlled loading/unloading and transportation modes, along with caster units for enhanced maneuverability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual operation is used for loading and unloading functions, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated loading and unloading operationVSAvoidcomplexity of loading unit mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The loading units are designed to automatically perform loading and unloading operations through motorized drive tracks and roller mechanisms that self-regulate during operation, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The loading units incorporate multiple functions within integrated mechanisms - the drive track both transports the loading unit and controls roller rotation, while the roller assembly simultaneously engages the skid, prevents lateral movement, and allows controlled rotation during loading/unloading operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed steering functionality is provided, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to tight turns and in-place rotation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuverability for tight turns and in-place rotationVSAvoidsteering control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The steering system transitions from fixed to dynamic control - the loading units can independently rotate and adjust their orientation during operation, enabling tight turns and in-place rotation while maintaining intuitive control through the motorized drive system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tug is divided into multiple independent loading units, each capable of autonomous movement and rotation. This segmentation allows individual units to navigate tight spaces and perform in-place rotations without requiring complex centralized steering mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If additional features are added to support differently sized aircraft, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of various skid sizesVSAvoidnumber of adjustable components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The loading units are designed as universal platforms that can accommodate various skid sizes through a single integrated mechanism. The adjustable separation bars and roller positioning systems allow the same basic structure to adapt to different helicopter configurations without requiring multiple specialized attachments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The separation bars between loading units are made adjustable and movable, allowing the distance between units to be dynamically changed to match different skid widths. This dynamic adjustment capability provides versatility without requiring multiple fixed configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If tug rollers are stationary during transport, then reliability is improved, but productivity during loading/unloading deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and unloading speedVSAvoidskid stability during transport
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The roller system transitions from stationary to rotating based on operational phase. During loading and unloading, rollers rotate to facilitate smooth movement of the skid. During transport, rollers lock to stationary position to prevent skid movement, providing both speed and stability through dynamic state change

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The roller rotation is activated periodically during specific operational phases (loading/unloading) and deactivated during transport phases. This periodic activation ensures high productivity during critical operations while maintaining reliability during transit through controlled state transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

5Object-affected harmful factors

If reverse synchronized rollers are used, then object-generated harmful factors are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral force on landing skidVSAvoidroller synchronization mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive track acts as an intermediary mechanism that controls roller rotation. By synchronizing roller rotation with drive track movement, the system eliminates lateral forces on the skid while maintaining a relatively simple mechanical linkage through the existing drive track structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11801945B2Helicopter tug apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 HAEGGSTROM TRACY
  • US11801945B2 patent drawing
  • US11801945B2 patent drawing
  • US11801945B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A helicopter tug apparatus for loading, transporting, and unloading a helicopter landing skid includes a plurality of landing skid loading units. The loading units are arranged to support the landing skid, and each of the loading units includes a skid cradle with a plurality of tug rollers configured to engage the landing skid. The loading units each include a drive track, and at least one motor for operating the skid cradle and the drive track. The rollers are reverse synchronized with the drive track, such that when the drive track moves the loading unit under the landing skid, the tug rollers turn in reverse to avoid placing lateral force on the landing skid.