Helicopter Twin-Engine Cooling via Forward Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current helicopters, particularly single-turbine and twin-turbine machines, face high production and operational costs, require extensive pilot training, and lack redundancy and safety standards for urban and water operations, with inefficient engine cooling systems that are vulnerable to fan malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A twin-engine helicopter design featuring two piston engines with independent operation, a flexible transmission system using drive belts, and an air-cooling system that utilizes the helicopter's forward motion to enhance cooling efficiency, allowing for safe operation with one engine in case of failure and reduced energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If twin-turbine engine helicopters are used, then safety and redundancy are improved, but production costs and operational costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidproduction costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by using simple, inexpensive piston engines instead of complex turbine engines. The engines are designed to be affordable and replaceable, with the helicopter capable of safe operation with one engine disabled, effectively treating the engine system as a redundant but economically manageable component rather than investing in expensive turbine technology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If twin-turbine engine helicopters are used, then safety and redundancy are improved, but pilot training requirements and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidpilot training
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by using simple, inexpensive piston engines instead of complex turbine engines. The engines are designed to be affordable and replaceable, with the helicopter capable of safe operation with one engine disabled, effectively treating the engine system as a redundant but economically manageable component rather than investing in expensive turbine technology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If single-piston engine helicopters are used, then costs are reduced, but safety standards for category A operations are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostsVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by dividing the powerplant into two independent piston engines rather than using a single engine. This segmentation provides the redundancy required for category A safety certification while keeping each individual engine simpler and more cost-effective than turbine engines, allowing the helicopter to safely operate with one engine disabled

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Temperature

If forced cooling systems with centrifugal fans are used, then engine cooling is ensured, but energy consumption increases and system vulnerability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine coolingVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by designing the cooling system to utilize the helicopter's forward motion and natural air flow to cool the engines. The radiators are positioned to receive impact pressure from forward flight, eliminating the need for power-consuming centrifugal fans and reducing energy consumption while maintaining effective cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Temperature

If centrifugal fans are used for engine cooling, then cooling is ensured, but system reliability decreases due to fan malfunction vulnerability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine coolingVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by designing the cooling system to utilize the helicopter's forward motion and natural air flow to cool the engines. The radiators are positioned to receive impact pressure from forward flight, eliminating the need for power-consuming centrifugal fans and reducing energy consumption while maintaining effective cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

6Device complexity

If radiators are positioned parallel to direction of movement, then space arrangement is simplified, but heat exchange efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace arrangementVSAvoidheat exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by designing the radiator orientation to work dynamically with the helicopter's forward motion. The radiators are positioned to receive impact pressure from the air created during forward flight, converting the dynamic aerodynamic environment into an advantage for heat exchange efficiency without complicating the spatial arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly reduces costs, extends operational flexibility, and provides a safer, more efficient cooling system, enabling operation in category A environments and reducing running costs to approximately 200-250 Euro per hour.

Implementation Method 1

the inlet opening of the air being suctioned does not benefit from the impact pressure of the air which is created when the helicopter is in forward flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact pressure: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

The required air is suctioned by a centrifugal fan that absorbs power from the engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2947013B1Helicopter
Publication Date: 2017.03.01 ROBBY MOTO ENG
  • EP2947013B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2947013B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2947013B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The helicopter (2) comprises a base frame (3) supporting: - a pilot's cab (4); - at least a rotor (5, 6), of which a primary rotor (5) and a secondary stabilization rotor (6); - a propulsion device (1) comprising: - at least a piston engine (7, 9), for rotating at least an engine shaft (8, 10); and - a transmission unit (11) comprising a drive shaft (12) connectable to said engine shaft (8, 10) and suitable for transmitting motion to said secondary rotor (6); - an air-cooling system (31) of the engine (7, 9) having: - a front air vent (32), located on the helicopter (2) in front position; - an air flow duct (33, 34, 35, 36) suitable for at least partially brushing the engine (7, 9) by the air coming from the front air vent (32); - an air suction impeller (37), associated with the drive shaft (12) and arranged along the flow duct (33, 34, 35, 36); - an outlet mouth (38) for the air coming from the flow duct (33, 34, 35, 36), located on the helicopter (2) in rear position.