Helium Pressure Generator for Cavity Agent Propulsion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing propulsion devices for fire extinguishing agents in cavities face challenges related to safety, complexity, weight, cost, and maintenance, particularly in aerospace applications, where reliable and efficient propulsion is crucial but often compromised by the use of energy-type fuels and complex manufacturing techniques.

Innovation Solution

A propulsion device with a pressure generator comprising two inert gas containers, each releasing helium as a propellant, ensuring agent expulsion even if one container malfunctions, with minimal energy usage and modular design for ease of maintenance and installation, using helium's unique properties to enhance safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a pyrotechnic module is used as the pressure generator, then propulsion efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase due to strict safety standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the pyrotechnic chemical system with a mechanical pressure generator consisting of a spring-loaded piston and valve mechanism. This mechanical system achieves reliable propulsion without the manufacturing complexity and safety concerns of pyrotechnic materials, while maintaining sufficient power output for agent expulsion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters by using a spring-loaded mechanical system instead of chemical combustion. The spring mechanism provides controlled pressure buildup and release, allowing precise control over the propulsion process without the uncontrollable thermal and chemical reactions of pyrotechnic modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a pyrotechnic module is used to ensure reliability, then safety is improved, but device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical spring-loaded system is significantly lighter than pyrotechnic modules while providing equivalent or superior reliability. The mechanical components (spring, piston, valve) are inherently more reliable than chemical systems, eliminating the need for heavy safety measures and complex manufacturing controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If inert gas containers are used, then safety is improved by reducing fire risk, but propulsion power may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire riskVSAvoidpropulsion power
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the spring mechanism parameters (spring constant, piston area, valve timing) to maximize propulsion power output from the inert gas pressure buildup. This allows the system to achieve high propulsion forces without the fire hazard of pyrotechnic materials, maintaining both safety and power performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a high-safety, lightweight, and cost-effective propulsion system with improved control over pressure profiles and reduced energy material usage, suitable for various transportation environments, ensuring reliable agent expulsion while minimizing the risk of fires and maintaining safety standards.

Implementation Method 1

at least one of the containers is pressurized (before using the device) with an inert-type gas that acts as a propellant gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas expansion: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The expansion of the gas is the direct mechanical propellant of the agent through the outflow port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

A pressure generator is fastened to the cap and configured to induce, e.g., by electrical triggering the propulsion of the agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure generation: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS8800672B2Propulsion device for an agent contained in a cavity
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG
  • US8800672B2 patent drawing
  • US8800672B2 patent drawing
  • US8800672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A propulsion device for an agent, such as an extinguishing or cooling agent, contained in a cavity has at least a cap and a port configured to open above a calibrated pressure inside the cavity. A pressure generator is fastened to the cap and triggers the propulsion of the agent. The pressure generator has at least two containers, each having an exit ending inside the cavity and releasing a propulsion gas. At least one container is pressurized with an inert-type gas, such as helium, suited for minimal temperature fluctuations induced inside the cavity during a relief of pressure of the gas from at least one of the containers. When the gas expands it is the direct mechanical propellant of the agent.