Protective Helmet Impact Absorption Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective helmets face challenges in balancing robustness and deformability to effectively absorb kinetic energy from impacts, which is crucial for protecting the head and cervical spine, while also ensuring comfort and preventing overheating.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an impact absorption device between the helmet shell and carrying basket, featuring a honeycomb structure of extruded copolymer tubes with plastic deformation behavior, which transfers kinetic energy and provides ventilation channels to prevent overheating, and a fastening device to secure the impact absorption device in place.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the helmet shell is made extremely robust to prevent breakage and penetration, then protection against head injuries is improved, but the ability to absorb kinetic energy from heavy objects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelmet shell strengthVSAvoidkinetic energy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The protective function is segmented between the helmet shell and a separate impact absorption device. The shell provides structural protection while the dedicated absorption device ( positioned between the shell and carrying basket) handles kinetic energy dissipation through its deformable structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An impact absorption device is introduced as an intermediary element between the helmet shell and the carrying basket. This mediator absorbs and dissipates kinetic energy through controlled deformation, preventing direct transmission of impact forces to the wearer's head

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If the helmet shell is made deformable to absorb kinetic energy, then protection of the cervical spine is improved, but the robustness and protection against penetration deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekinetic energy absorptionVSAvoidhelmet shell strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The protective functions are divided between two separate components: the helmet shell maintains structural integrity for penetration resistance, while the impact absorption device provides controlled deformability for kinetic energy absorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The impact absorption device serves as a mediator that combines the desirable properties of both a robust shell and a deformable structure, allowing the shell to remain strong while still enabling energy absorption through the intermediate device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If the helmet shell is made robust, then protection against head injuries is improved, but the comfort and ventilation for the wearer deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelmet shell strengthVSAvoidwearer comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The impact absorption device is positioned locally between the helmet shell and the carrying basket, providing impact absorption functionality in the critical impact zone without compromising the overall comfort and ventilation properties of the helmet shell for the wearer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances protection against high-kinetic-energy impacts by optimizing the helmet shell's deformability and ensuring the impact absorption device handles energy absorption, while maintaining comfort and preventing overheating through effective ventilation.

Implementation Method 1

the impact absorption device exhibits essentially plastic deformation behavior in the event of an impact on the helmet shell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

A useful ventilation effect can be promoted in particular if these tubes have their ends facing the wearer's head on the one hand and away from the wearer's head on the other hand

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVentilation: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3054801B1Protective helmet
Publication Date: 2018.03.14 PFANNER SCHUTZBEKLEIDUNG
  • EP3054801B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3054801B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3054801B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a protective helmet comprising a helmet shell (12), a support cage (14) and a securing device for securing the support cage (14) to the helmet shell (12). According to the invention, an impact absorption device (18) is arranged between the support cage (14) and the helmet shell (12).